How about this for mis-grading a card!!
![BruceinGa](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/lazy construction.gif)
(first of all I hope is isn't anyone here!)
I mean, I'm new to grading but this is ridiculous.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1961-61-TOPPS-124-JC-MARTIN-WHITE-SOX-ROOKIE-RC-BASEBALL-CARD-NEAR-MINT-NM-/170931429161?pt=US_Baseball&hash=item27cc4e9f29
I mean, I'm new to grading but this is ridiculous.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1961-61-TOPPS-124-JC-MARTIN-WHITE-SOX-ROOKIE-RC-BASEBALL-CARD-NEAR-MINT-NM-/170931429161?pt=US_Baseball&hash=item27cc4e9f29
![image](http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/1/6/4/6/5/7/6/webimg/584784807_tp.jpg)
0
Comments
link
Someone should buy it just to return it as "item not as described" LOL
What a maroon!
Joe
<< <i> SGC = PSA >>
What is wrong with this? Why isn't SGC=PSA, the only reason I can surmise is they created the first registry...the other examples make sense.