Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Which card is better?

abcoltsfanabcoltsfan Posts: 802 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
In your opinion which card is better as far as centering and overall appearance is concerned? I am thinking the second card but am curious to get opinions. Both cards are graded the same.

image

image

Working on the following sets
1980's and 1990's Topps Baseball BBCE FASC - Cello or Wax Boxes
1952 Bowman US Presidents PSA 7 & up
Pro Football Hall of Fame Indianapolis Colts PSA Registry Set
June 9th Cubs full ticket or stubs - 1981 to 2020
Andre Dawson Topps Basic registry PSA 10's
Mark Grace Topps Basic registry PSA 10's

Comments

  • WalterSobchakWalterSobchak Posts: 2,096
    It would be helpful to have a better scan of the first card, but based on what I see I would rather have the first card.
    'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.'
    -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14

    *1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
    *Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
  • gameusedhoopgameusedhoop Posts: 3,593 ✭✭✭✭
    Scans not being equal it is tough to judge, but I am leaning towards #1 as being nicer.
    Better centering on #1, bottom edge looks rough in #2, but maybe also in #1, hard to tell from poor scan.
    Given the evidence as pictured, I'd go #1.
  • abcoltsfanabcoltsfan Posts: 802 ✭✭✭
    I agree the scan in the first isn't good. I just pulled it off ebay.

    Working on the following sets
    1980's and 1990's Topps Baseball BBCE FASC - Cello or Wax Boxes
    1952 Bowman US Presidents PSA 7 & up
    Pro Football Hall of Fame Indianapolis Colts PSA Registry Set
    June 9th Cubs full ticket or stubs - 1981 to 2020
    Andre Dawson Topps Basic registry PSA 10's
    Mark Grace Topps Basic registry PSA 10's

  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭


    << <i>Scans not being equal it is tough to judge, but I am leaning towards #1 as being nicer.
    Better centering on #1, bottom edge looks rough in #2, but maybe also in #1, hard to tell from poor scan.
    Given the evidence as pictured, I'd go #1. >>


    image
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭


    << <i>I agree the scan in the first isn't good. I just pulled it off ebay. >>


    I would ask the seller for a better pic.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
Sign In or Register to comment.