OK guys, break my heart....Are these autos legit? Elway Moon Pippen Eric Davis LT
![Rudedawg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/kingpin-ernie.jpg)
I purchased these fairly cheap, so I took a chance. Let me know your opinions and if you would like better scans. Planned on sending to PSA/DNA. Also, has anyone ever used PSA's "Quick Opinion"??? Thanks much!!!!
![image](http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj485/Rudedawg7/scan0035_zpsdecea655.jpg)
![image](http://i1264.photobucket.com/albums/jj485/Rudedawg7/scan0035_zpsdecea655.jpg)
Currently collecting PSA graded:
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
0
Comments
Speck- Three of them were from an on-line autograph website and the other two are from separate eBay auctions and sellers.
I hadn't really dived into raw autos until a few months ago and have learned a lot from this board since then. When people say that 80% of autos on-line are fake, I'm starting to believe that!
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
<< <i>They look like they were all signed by the same person with the same pen. >>
that was my knee-jerk reaction too
<< <i>They look like they were all signed by the same person with the same pen. >>
+2
<< <i>that was my knee-jerk reaction too >>
+1
I collect Pro Vision autos specifically and not many are slabbed currently. I've bought two Pro Vision autos raw on eBay (Doc Gooden and Barry Bonds) and they were slabbed by PSA/DNA recently. Either way, from this point on, I will consult the board when I find raw ones for sale
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
<< <i>I also thought same person/same sharpie. >>
And the same size auto as well. The only one that looks distinct is Lawrence Taylor, which looks more dainty in comparison. But they all seem to have a similar height and width and angle, as well as sharpie "handling" (according to my unprofessional guess).
Once I got the LT card in hand, I noticed the first letter had a "double line" .......like they stopped too early and tried to extend the letter afterward.
So, I'm getting the consensus that none of these are worth submitting to PSA/DNA???
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps
In regards to buying autographs, not everyone has the opportunity/time/geographical area to get autographs. The next best thing is buying them if it's something they like. Back in the day, I did a few TTMs for that reason and am fortunate to be in an area where I can get them IP instead.
I completely agree with you that raw autos are largely forged, even TTM's. I'm finding that out and educating myself so I don't waste TOO much time and money. I would also rather meet a player AND get his auto, but it likely ain't gonna happen for me at this point. As *byron* said, "to each his own". I don't really understand all the 1/100 or even 1/1 autos going for hundreds or thousands. Generally speaking, an auto is an auto to me, but some love that stuff.
1991 & 1992 Fleer Pro Visions
1952 Topps