Home› Sports Talk

Tim Hudson a future HOF member?

PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
in Sports Talk
I was looking over Hudson's career numbers, especially his won-loss record of 197-103. How many more wins would he need to be considered a serious candidate?

Comments

  • BrickBrick Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would think 103 should do it.
    Collecting 1960 Topps Baseball in PSA 8
    http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/

    Ralph

  • PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
    Really? I was thinking more like 60 wins would get him in, in light of his winning pct.
  • mcadamsmcadams Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭
    he still has a long road ahead oh him. still pitching great though.
    Successful transactions with: thedutymon, tsalems1, davidpuddy, probstein123, lodibrewfan, gododgersfan, dialj, jwgators, copperjj, larryp, hookem, boopotts, crimsontider, rogermnj, swartz1, Counselor

    Always buying Bobby Cox inserts. PM me.
  • PowderedH2OPowderedH2O Posts: 2,443 ✭✭
    OK, so Tim Hudson yesterday pitched like... well, Tim Hudson. He now sits at 206 wins against 111 losses. At 38, does he have enough time to get to 300 wins? Probably not. But, if he gets to 250 with a winning percentage of well over .600, is that good enough for the HOF? Here's my next question: Hudson has had fifteen consecutive winning seasons to start his career and has never had a losing or .500 season. Has anyone else done this to start their career?
    Successful dealings with shootybabitt, LarryP, Doctor K, thedutymon, billsgridirongreats, fattymacs, shagrotn77, pclpads, JMDVM, gumbyfan, itzagoner, rexvos, al032184, gregm13, californiacards3, mccardguy1, BigDaddyBowman, bigreddog, bobbyw8469, burke23, detroitfan2, drewsef, jeff8877, markmac, Goldlabels, swartz1, blee1, EarlsWorld, gseaman25, kcballboy, jimrad, leadoff4, weinhold, Mphilking, milbroco, msassin, meteoriteguy, rbeaton and gameusedhoop.
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>OK, so Tim Hudson yesterday pitched like... well, Tim Hudson. He now sits at 206 wins against 111 losses. At 38, does he have enough time to get to 300 wins? Probably not. But, if he gets to 250 with a winning percentage of well over .600, is that good enough for the HOF? >>




    Is Mike Mussina a Hall of Famer?

    Mussina: 3562.2 ip, 270 - 153 (.638 WL%), 3.68 era, 1.192 whip

    Hudson: 2821.1 ip, 206-111 (.650 WL%), 3.44 era, 1.231 whip
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • PowderedH2OPowderedH2O Posts: 2,443 ✭✭
    I think Mike Mussina is certainly worthy of Hall of Fame induction. I think it will happen.
    Successful dealings with shootybabitt, LarryP, Doctor K, thedutymon, billsgridirongreats, fattymacs, shagrotn77, pclpads, JMDVM, gumbyfan, itzagoner, rexvos, al032184, gregm13, californiacards3, mccardguy1, BigDaddyBowman, bigreddog, bobbyw8469, burke23, detroitfan2, drewsef, jeff8877, markmac, Goldlabels, swartz1, blee1, EarlsWorld, gseaman25, kcballboy, jimrad, leadoff4, weinhold, Mphilking, milbroco, msassin, meteoriteguy, rbeaton and gameusedhoop.
  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>OK, so Tim Hudson yesterday pitched like... well, Tim Hudson. He now sits at 206 wins against 111 losses. At 38, does he have enough time to get to 300 wins? Probably not. But, if he gets to 250 with a winning percentage of well over .600, is that good enough for the HOF? >>




    Is Mike Mussina a Hall of Famer?

    Mussina: 3562.2 ip, 270 - 153 (.638 WL%), 3.68 era, 1.192 whip

    Hudson: 2821.1 ip, 206-111 (.650 WL%), 3.44 era, 1.231 whip >>




    Definitely.
  • markj111markj111 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭
    Hudson has a better ERA+ than Drysdale. If he goes 3-55 for the rest of his career, he'll have the same W/L record.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭


    << <i>Here's my next question: Hudson has had fifteen consecutive winning seasons to start his career and has never had a losing or .500 season. Has anyone else done this to start their career? >>


    Only person I could think of that comes close is ANDY PETTITTE. In his entire 18 years of pitching he never had a losing season ... although in years 14 & 18 he was .500.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • Skin2Skin2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭

    Name.........IP.........ERA+
    Hudson...2,821......124
    Mussina..3,562......123
    K. Brown.3,256......127
    Schilling..3,261......127
    SMoltz....3,473......125




    He is about 500-700 innings behind those guys. Most likely, that ERA+ drops more by time he catches up to those guys in innings pitched.

    This is career wise. Peak dominance plays a role as well.

    Out of that list of contemporaries, Smoltz and Schilling are most worthy. Followed by Mussina, Brown, then Hudson.
  • larryallen73larryallen73 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭
    No.
  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,064 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No. Not a high enough peak.
Sign In or Register to comment.