That earlier link of that coin doesn't work for me.
Wow, what a write up! Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson have nothing over the investigative capabilities of the seller. If given a little more time I'm confident they could produce the Civil War purse that this coin was stored in.
The auction doesn't even show the coin in a PCGS holder. Doesn't matter to me what the seller claims.
Here is the Trueview. it's in a VF details (97) holder. Environmental damage. MJ
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
the first seller's photos look ED to me and it seems like a lot of words to plead a case that it is AT and to justify a numerical grade with little to back it up that word count.
I don't see the description as being out of line at all. The job of a salesperson is to promote their inventory in the best manner that they know. Certainly this seller's feedback has reasonable credibility, so what is the big deal? It doesn't cost anything but some personal time to ask the necessary questions of the seller and base a decision on the responses. The OP is known as a very knowledgeable collector of the series - maybe he could elaborate on his opinion of this offer?
<< <i>NO where in that description does it state this is a problem coin. IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THE ISSUES ON THE COIN. WHY DOES HE NOT SHOW THE SLAB???? >>
It sounds like seller doesn't have the coin back yet.
<< <i>The OP is known as a very knowledgeable collector of the series - maybe he could elaborate on his opinion of this offer
<< <i> Compared to many others on the board I am a novice in this series.
I thought this listing for a key date was amusing at best. Seller should come out and state how he feels and not beat around the bush with window dressing. He is entitled to say he does not agree witht he TPG assessment. I looked at his feedback too and it appears solid. I was not saying seller is bad. I commend his efforts to spin the grade in a favorable light. My favorite is this: "Many chemicals associated with the manufacture of leather are known to initiate and promote the "toning" [atmospheric corrosion] of silver coins. My coin, the coin I offer here, possesses absolutely none of the characteristic issues that are generally housed under the "environmental damage" designation."
Freddie
It is not that life is short, but that you are dead for so very long.
I don't know about the seller's knowledge of 19th century storage techniques. They do spin a pretty good yarn though.
The coin is corroded. That's the bottom line. Really makes no difference how it got that way. It makes it like most other existing 60-s quarters. Considering the coin's tiny mintage and being from San Francisco, it's probably very likely the coin never made it back east to the Civil War. Now if the seller had claimed it was in the 1906 SF Earthquake, that would be more believable....
Comments
Coin Rarities Online
The broken language sounds like every bad scam email I've ever gotten.
Just one word.....repeated, over and over.
Run, run, run, run, Forrest run.
Ok I threw in Forrest part.
http://www.coinshop.com
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
Coin he purchased
Pictures look a lot better, but a lot less revealing about the past cleaning.
Wow, what a write up! Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson have nothing over the investigative capabilities of the seller. If given a little more time I'm confident they could
produce the Civil War purse that this coin was stored in.
The auction doesn't even show the coin in a PCGS holder. Doesn't matter to me what the seller claims.
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
<< <i>Here is the Trueview. it's in a VF details (97) holder. Environmental damage. MJ >>
that makes sense as i figured the holder wasn't pictured because it was a details holder
.
<< <i>I don't see the description as being out of line at all. >>
Please Note: The surfaces of this coin's field are flat everywhere and entirely absent of pitting or other structural damage.
This coin is absolutely corrosion free!
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't see the description as being out of line at all. >>
Please Note: The surfaces of this coin's field are flat everywhere and entirely absent of pitting or other structural damage.
This coin is absolutely corrosion free!
GAAAAAAAACK!
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
If there is no issue with that description given the actual slab, then you hopefully you won't get taken by such poor descriptions.
IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THE ISSUES ON THE COIN. WHY DOES HE NOT SHOW THE SLAB????
Problems all over this listing
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
<< <i>NO where in that description does it state this is a problem coin. IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THE ISSUES ON THE COIN. WHY DOES HE NOT SHOW THE SLAB???? >>
It sounds like seller doesn't have the coin back yet.
<< <i>The OP is known as a very knowledgeable collector of the series - maybe he could elaborate on his opinion of this offer
<< <i>
Compared to many others on the board I am a novice in this series.
I thought this listing for a key date was amusing at best. Seller should come out and state how he feels and not beat around the bush with window dressing. He is entitled to say he does not agree witht he TPG assessment. I looked at his feedback too and it appears solid. I was not saying seller is bad. I commend his efforts to spin the grade in a favorable light. My favorite is this: "Many chemicals associated with the manufacture of leather are known to initiate and promote the "toning" [atmospheric corrosion] of silver coins. My coin, the coin I offer here, possesses absolutely none of the characteristic issues that are generally housed under the "environmental damage" designation."
Freddie
The coin is corroded. That's the bottom line. Really makes no difference how it got that way. It makes it like most other existing 60-s quarters.
Considering the coin's tiny mintage and being from San Francisco, it's probably very likely the coin never made it back east to the Civil War. Now if the seller
had claimed it was in the 1906 SF Earthquake, that would be more believable....