Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Thoughts....1883/2 is it???....can it be?..more photos

Does this look like an overdate????

image

image

image

image

Comments

  • Hard to see... try an up close picture of the date.
    I'm Just Sayin"


    http://www.coinshop.com
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Hard to see... try an up close picture of the date. >>


    +1

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would say no.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,732 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Howard Spindel, who is a member here and may stop by to offer his personal opinion of your coin, created this excellent web site with photos and diagnostics for all of the known 1883 over 2 shield nickels. I didn't take the time to look through them for a match to your coin, but I see enough potential in your pics that I think it would be worthwhile for you to look through them yourself.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • howardshowards Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭
    It's really hard to be positive from your photos. A big blow-up of the date would be very helpful.

    However, I think you have an FS-013.1 1883/2, early die stage with almost no die cracks. I think I can see a die crack off the bottom left leaf that looks like the correct shape. The date position is an excellent match, and I think I can see the foot of the 2 where I would expect to see it. Please don't run off thinking you've got a for sure 1883/2 until you post photos sufficient for me to verify this.

    Compare your coin against the photos on this page:

    FS-013.1

    At least you didn't post the usual 1882 with the blobby 2! I enjoy seeing a coin that actually has a chance of being an overdate.
  • PRIZ430PRIZ430 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for your opinions on this coin...here are 2 more photos...they show more of what I think is a 2 under the 3, extending just to the left of the 3....

    image

    image
  • howardshowards Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭
    Definitely FS-013.1!
  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>At least you didn't post the usual 1882 with the blobby 2! I enjoy seeing a coin that actually has a chance of being an overdate. >>



    agreed!

    I am tired of correcting dealers for the same reason
    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • howardshowards Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭
    Surprised to see no more comments here, especially from the OP.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file