Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

So on modern cards..."Game Used, Jersey, Patch, Swatch, Relic"....are they all the same th

Different words that all basically mean the same thing or are there differences?

Comments

  • I would say they were all the same except for patch. That's a bit more specific and refers to the decarative portions of the jersey as opposed to the plain color parts of the jersey.
    Chris
    My small collection
    Want List:
    '61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
    Cardinal T206 cards
    Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
  • HallcoHallco Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would say they were all the same except for patch. That's a bit more specific and refers to the decarative portions of the jersey as opposed to the plain color parts of the jersey. >>



    Cool! Thanks for the info! image
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    As card manufacturers use the terms, there are other differences. As sellers use the terms, lots of slightly different things get lumped together.

    Going to what card manufacturers say, everything is a relic. A swatch is a relic that is fabric (as opposed to a piece of bat, stick, ball, etc.).
    Game-used means the relic was a piece of something worn/used by a player (or occasionally coach) in a game, as opposed to a photo shoot or some other event. Some card manufacturers consider things worn during warmup for a game to be game-used. This usually is noticed in the case of a relic that is not a jersey - a warmup jacket, shooting shirt, etc. A jersey is a specific part of the uniform - you will also find cards that are game-worn caps, shoes, pants, gloves, etc. For most players, a game-worn jersey card is more valuable than a game-worn pants card, and in the case of vintage HOFers, the difference can mean a jersey card is 2 or 3 times as expensive as a pants card. A patch, as stated by cwazzy, is those parts of the jersey that are not part of the basic background. Note that most patches are one color.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • Fake? Probably so.
  • lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    A relic, I believe, could be part of a bat also.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • dtkk49adtkk49a Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭
    Yes, you can say they are basically the same - worthless for the most part.
    Follow me - Cards_and_Coins on Instagram



    They call me "Pack the Ripper"
  • jmmiller777jmmiller777 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭
    And something else of interest; some "relics" will have disclaimer that the item could be a "representation" or a "similiar" artifact. I guess this leaves the door wide open for interpertation. It could be a different players item. I have a Piazza card with a piece of the back wall or pads from the fence. Since he was a Dodger at the time, you would think the material would be Dodger blue. I think the color is black. I don't ever rememeber the back wall being black. I remember I used to joke that it was prolly a piece of the rain tarp.
    CURRENT PROJECTS IN WORK:
    To be honest, no direction, but...
    1966-69 Topps EX+
    1975 minis NrMt Kelloggs PSA 9
    All Topps Heritage-Master Sets
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.