Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Is Beckett Price Guide In Touch with Market Prices?

About a month ago I won on eBay a George Bell Fan Favorite Autographed card for a whopping $1.50. The "common" card is listed at $12.00. In addition, I have from the series George Foster, Greg Luzinski, Cleon Jones, Terry Pendleton and Ed Kranepool. These are listed around $15-$20, but could be had for about $2-3 each for bidding.

That said, standard issue cards as well, from the same series seems seriously undervalued in comparison with prices based on Beckett's guide. Ripken listed at $4 could be had for a buck or less. And same goes for all the other stars and rookies save Harper being almost complete opposite or on target with book value.

What are your thoughts? Am I missing something with the price guide? My assumption is that new cards are usually mint out of the package (cutting and centering has become very good in the past 20 years). Older cards I can understand variances in pricing based on condition, rarity, etc. But these new cards there is enough to go around at least once so I wonder if people are just letting them go at any price or the interest in them are not reflective to Becket's pricing.

In general it seems eBay is a more accurate price guide.

Comments

  • i use eBay
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    I have no idea how Beckett comes up with their prices, but you can typically buy what you want on Ebay for half what Beckett says it's worth.

    Some guys seem to use the Beckett as their bible, and will get really bent out of shape if you disagree.

    As I see it, if I want a particular card, recent past sales on Ebay is a good indicator as to what I should expect to pay for the card, except for when the player does something recently that causes a bump (or dump) in demand.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • jfkheatjfkheat Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There hasn't been a price guide in the last 10 or 15 years that was in touch with the actual price that cards sold for.
    James
  • I find that Beckett Price Guides needs a major revamp. I think they should come out with a Vintage Price Guide and a Modern one. They really need to get a team of individuals and really start looking up prices and just rework there whole listing system - starting with the major cards first. Then work there way down. Also bring back those articles we use to love and even make it kid friendly again in the process. Have silly articles. Readers write use to be one of my favorite articles. Bring back interviews and put cards front and center again. Also start reporting on card shows across the country.

    I believe they single handedly started the market boom back in 1984. Either they change for the better or they will eventually soon fade away. Oh, and bring down the prices on there magazines. $10 month for prices that stay stagnant. Ummm no thanks.
  • I think the Beckett prices are really more for retail stores. If you own a shop with all the overhead, you need to get closer to Beckett book to keep those doors open. But you are exactly right, most price guides are not all that accurate.

    On the other end of the scale though, take a well centered, vintage, HOF rookie card and you will have to pay much more than most book values. VCP is pretty accurate for the middle of the range graded card, but not accurate for the top of the range graded card, but that really doesn't help you for newer items.
  • zep33zep33 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭
    Beckett hasn't been relevant since Al Gore invented the internet
  • I have the Beckett Graded Price Guide, 1st Edition 2012. The Vintage is spot on. I have looked at hundreds of vintage prices and every single one is accurate. I don't collect anything after 1949 so can't comment on those.

    I should add that there is at least one anomaly where a card has increased in value greatly recently, and in a short time span. That being the Ruth M101-4/5. It is low in the Guide but correct for pricing from late last year.
  • Beckett has never been in touch with market prices.
  • BunchOBullBunchOBull Posts: 6,188 ✭✭✭
    eBay was really the nail in the coffin for Beckett. Even before the advent of online auctions, hobby shops were running "sales" of percentages off Beckett value, so the prices were always arbitrary anyway. Just some fanciful game of darts with no real market relevance. eBay has been the looking glass that exposed just how disillusion the system is.


    That said, I've paid hundreds for cards Beckett says are worth a few pennies...so they're wrong from both directions.
    Collector of most things Frank Thomas. www.BigHurtHOF.com
  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I find that Beckett Price Guides needs a major revamp. I think they should come out with a Vintage Price Guide and a Modern one. They really need to get a team of individuals and really start looking up prices and just rework there whole listing system - starting with the major cards first. Then work there way down. q]

    That would be so much work, but that is exactly what needs to be done.
    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • FrozencaribouFrozencaribou Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beckett prices were relevant until 1992 or 1993. I'm not sure what happened to the company but when prices stopped fluctuating on a month to month basis and space saving omissions of detail started to emerge, their status plummeted.

    Perhaps it was all an illusion. Perhaps Dr. Beckett didn't have a pricing formula at all. Perhaps no one could really tell that a 1989 Score Von Hayes was really selling for .12.

  • Beckett's Graded Card Investor was actually pretty good as far as pricing go. There were some obvious misses but for the most part it was very well put together. SMR could have learned a thing or two from that one. Actually pretty disappointed they stopped producing it.

    But regular Beckett's suck.
    Chris
    My small collection
    Want List:
    '61 Topps Roy Campanella in PSA 5-7
    Cardinal T206 cards
    Adam Wainwright GU Jersey
  • Seems to me, with the confusion of cards through the late 90's and early 2000's from sets, subsets, etc., that you would think for $10 they could include a picture of the card set to make a visual break from set to set. Also to identify the card quicker. A color pic would be better. Pics from the subsets would a bonus! Thats just me.

    Its a valuable reference in its own right, but as you all mentioned, does not seem to reflect current prices people are paying. I thought before internet sales, most prices came from card shows. Either what was being purchased or sold at or some sort of average of the two.
  • remember... a guide is just a guide not a rulebook... that said, beckett is really for dealers not collectors anymore... he gives them a reason to justify wildly high prices and opening bids on newer stuff...
    but, e-bay is the great equalizer... nothing beats real world market prices... and the auction activity backs this up...

    if you set your opening bid too high, your item will not sell... set it right and it will sell... although it might for less than either the seller or beckett would have hoped...

    ps---gore did not invent the internet... i believe he was busy inventing global warming at that time...
  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I have the Beckett Graded Price Guide, 1st Edition 2012. The Vintage is spot on. I have looked at hundreds of vintage prices and every single one is accurate. I don't collect anything after 1949 so can't comment on those.

    I should add that there is at least one anomaly where a card has increased in value greatly recently, and in a short time span. That being the Ruth M101-4/5. It is low in the Guide but correct for pricing from late last year. >>



    Leon is spot on...Beckett introduced a new guide at the National and actually gave out free copies at the Net54 dinner...This guide seems to be more accurate than SMR...One draw back is the low pop commons...Beckett left the price blank on a lot of these due to volatility of pricing...I spoke to one of the Beckett guys and asked if maybe they could put LP for low pop or another symbol instead of a blank...The way I check a guide is by looking up the price for a 65 Namath rookie...Beckett was really close to the actual market price...But the best realtime priceguide is VCP by far.

    Kirk


  • << <i>I use VCP & eBay.

    And IMO, while it's important to take note of the off eBay auction house results for a given card, I find they can often times be wildly inaccurate.

    Case in point is the 1975 Topps #620 Gary Carter PSA 10 that miconelegacy recently sold via Probstein:

    image

    Basically you gotta filter any info you get. >>



    You can never under estimate the amount of ego in our hobby (I have one too image). The PSA set Registry is one of the all time great marketing efforts in our hobby. It's a bit different collecting than I do but I think it is great overall. Anything that card collectors get excited about is good. If folks want to collect a set and be higher on the registry, and will pay a ton for that privilege, I say knock yourself out.

    As for the new Beckett guide, I will stand by my original statement, as I perused it again just yesterday. I can't find a pre-war price that is very far off at all.
  • I think the smart play is to use multiple guides. I use ebay, VCP & SMR & find that VCP is more accurate but has problem areas also. Too often, their average prices are brought down because of listings that do not include the qulifyer (OC, MC, PD, ST etc...)

    What is also very frustrating to me, since I collect vintage cards and try to only get very well centered cards, is that you have to figure out the premium yourself. One of the places I keep track of my inventory is on VCP, and I am always in the red of their average prices.

  • BoopottsBoopotts Posts: 6,784 ✭✭


    << <i>Beckett hasn't been relevant since Al Gore invented the internet >>



    And just when would that have been?


  • << <i> Some guys seem to use the Beckett as their bible, and will get really bent out of shape if you disagree. >>



    Amen. I hate trading with them too... Fortunately haven't run into many here, just other boards and groups.
    Matt's Card Page
    What I'm selling
    image

    Building Sets, Collecting Texas Rangers, and Texas Tech Red Raiders
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i><< Some guys seem to use the Beckett as their bible, and will get really bent out of shape if you disagree. >>

    Amen. I hate trading with them too... Fortunately haven't run into many here, just other boards and groups. >>



    I recently had an interesting interaction with a seller (lots of feedback selling raw and graded modern cards) who got offended when I made a best-offer that was less than half "book."

    I pointed out that the last few sales of the card were in line with my offer, and he said:

    "Those prices are not market value. Market value in beckett, which requires more research, is more accurate than recent sales on eBay. You go around offering people half book value on cards because you missed out on a good deal is the a-hole move."

    LOL.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • mtcardsmtcards Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭
    Honestly, Beckett is not even remotely close. On hot cards, they are generally UNDER what the price is selling for and on non popular cards they are anywhere from 100-500% higher.

    This has been discussed before and one day I will find the old beckett issue that had it in there, when in the readers write section, someone wrote in about how most cards on ebay sell for under the low price listed in Beckett and never sell for close to the high price and the editor wrote back that beckett does not use ebay prices for the standard pricing of cards. The will sometimes however use sales as a "blurb" if it is a rare or high grade card, but for general pricing, they do not take into account ebay sales at all.

    This has been debated, but I know what I read and if you look at virtually any card, would bear out the truth of this. How many people are paying $30 for a raw score Barry Sanders rookie? Very few if any. Same goes for raw Ripken, Boggs, Bonds, Sandberg and so forth.
    IT IS ALWAYS CHEAPER TO NOT SELL ON EBAY
  • handymanhandyman Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think its because everyone wants to pay less than what something is worth/guide. And most do go by beckett but they want to pay .10 on the dollar.
    You can never win if you are a guide. Several people want to pay half VCP these days.
    There is not a single guide that can give you the exact value of any item.
    So no becket is not in touch with this given seconds market price.
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭


    << <i>So no becket is not in touch with this given seconds market price. >>



    It's not in touch with this given year's market price.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • vladguerrerovladguerrero Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭
    SMR is my bible, and if it's not listed it's not worth buying.
Sign In or Register to comment.