Home› U.S. Coin Forum

OGR Walker,... overgraded, upgrade candidate or graded just right?

ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,092 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
We all know that coins in OGR holders will often upgrade. Walkers aren't my series, but I think this coin is, as labeled, a 64. What do all of you think?

image
image
image
image

Comments

  • deviousdevious Posts: 1,690 ✭
    64 and no plus!
  • dlmtortsdlmtorts Posts: 743 ✭✭✭
    Not my specialty either, but i dont believe that is an upgrade candidate.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,715 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice luster, but way too many marks and knicks in the prime focal areas on the obverse.....the reverse looks nice, but the obverse carries the weight. The luster and the date (38D) likely carried it. I think it's on the low end of 64, and I don't think it would upgrade to 65 in anyone's holder.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Over graded in the current holder because of date and Mint mark.
    image
    My Current project....https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/160794
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A lot of chatter and a few fairly heavy digs. I sure wouldn't crack that one and send in as you may not like the results. I would say this is one has remained in that holder for a reason.
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I didn't know that they often upgrade, and I don't think yours will.

    image
    LCoopie = Les
  • sawyerjoshsawyerjosh Posts: 416 ✭✭✭
    64
    As a seller: USARarities, acloco, coindudeonebay, Twinturbo, MICHAELDIXON, blu62vette, mothra454, LukeMarshall, USARarities
    As a buyer: QualityCurrencycom, tychojoe, AurumMiner, Collectorcoins, perfectstrike, ModCrewman, LeeBone, nickel, REALGATOR, MICHAELDIXON, pointfivezero, Walkerguy21D
    Trades: georgiacop50
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The low-hanging, currently undergraded fruit in rattler holders has long been picked clean. What we have left are those coins that don't scream undergraded, have managed to avoid the regrade scenario from being hidden or having been in a safe collection and coins that simply made no financial sense to regrade. The WLH shown in this thread has potentially negative eye appeal due to the obverse spots and also plenty of chatter behind Ms. Liberty.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • MilkmanDanMilkmanDan Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Over graded in the current holder because of date and Mint mark.
    image >>


    Agreed.
  • philographerphilographer Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks 63 to me!

    He who knows he has enough is rich.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,888 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no bean!


    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 38-D was not struck very well, especially in the thumb area. This coin has got a very average strike for a 38-D----not a real standout. It has a soft reverse, too. It also has numerous marks but with decent luster. The bottom line----it's an accurately graded coin but with no chance for an upgrade. IMHO.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • AhrensdadAhrensdad Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭
    Looks 63 to me.
    Successful BST Transactions with: WTCG, Ikenefic, Twincam, InternetJunky, bestday, 1twobits, Geoman x4, Blackhawk, Robb, nederveit, mesquite, sinin1, CommemDude, Gerard, sebrown, Guitarwes, Commoncents05, tychojoe, adriana, SeaEagleCoins, ndgoflo, stone, vikingdude, golfer72, kameo, Scotty1418, Tdec1000, Sportsmoderator1 and many others.


    Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My grading opinion: 63 obverse equals 63.
    All glory is fleeting.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...