Would You Make This Trade? POLL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d15/f5d151ed580488263ecc2b161eaabf5c40061af8" alt="MattyC"
GIVING UP:
1975 Topps Mini Nolan Ryan HL #5 POP 3 - PSA 10
1968 Topps Tom Seaver PSA 9
1968 Bench RC PSA 9
1976 Topps Brett PSA 8
1977 & 1978 Topps George Brett regular issue card (not HL or LL, etc) both PSA 9
1981 & 1982 Topps Rickey Henderson regular issues both PSA 10
1979 Topps Molitor PSA 9
(3) 1983 Traded Strawberrys all PSA 10
(2) 1984 Donruss Mattinglys both PSA 10
1959 Bob Gibson RC - PSA 8 (blazer, centered, never reviewed for bump)
1976 Guidry RC - PSA 9
1979 Dale Murphy PSA 9
* and about 2K cash
** the only card that will likely by impossible to replace of the above, ever, is the Ryan HL mini in PSA 10, usually brutally centered
FOR...
Bird/Magic - RC PSA 10
1975 Topps Mini Nolan Ryan HL #5 POP 3 - PSA 10
1968 Topps Tom Seaver PSA 9
1968 Bench RC PSA 9
1976 Topps Brett PSA 8
1977 & 1978 Topps George Brett regular issue card (not HL or LL, etc) both PSA 9
1981 & 1982 Topps Rickey Henderson regular issues both PSA 10
1979 Topps Molitor PSA 9
(3) 1983 Traded Strawberrys all PSA 10
(2) 1984 Donruss Mattinglys both PSA 10
1959 Bob Gibson RC - PSA 8 (blazer, centered, never reviewed for bump)
1976 Guidry RC - PSA 9
1979 Dale Murphy PSA 9
* and about 2K cash
** the only card that will likely by impossible to replace of the above, ever, is the Ryan HL mini in PSA 10, usually brutally centered
FOR...
Bird/Magic - RC PSA 10
0
Comments
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
BTW that is a #19 '76 Brett PSA 9 correct?
I would rather just have all of them and buy a PSA 9 Bird/Magic with part of the 2 k
<< <i>No
I would rather just have all of them and buy a PSA 9 Bird/Magic with part of the 2 k >>
and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub,
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
All the 9s were carefully selected and no dogs; so they are 9s that look like 10s but perhaps under the loupe reveal why they didn't get the love.
Appreciate the input.
and send for a bump till you get it
can we see the Bird/Magic 10? (without the flip, of course)
i'd have to be knocked over by the scan to think about making that trade.
a friend of mine has one of the nicest PSA 9's ive ever seen. minimal to zero print marks or tilt, great centering. im sure on any given day, it would have a shot at a 10
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
These responses are very helpful. I believe the Bird Magic is a POP 18 in PSA 10 but it hardly every comes up. One is on ebay from PWCC right now at 10,000. It seems very nice but MAY have a tiny smudge by the name in the Dr. J panel.
What has really amazed me about the Bird Magic is just how ugly all the 9s I've ever seen are.
I totally, deeply agree with your assessment of 9s vs 10s; that has actually been my collecting philosophy for some time now. Actually wrote about it at length in some threads a ways back.
Yet with this particular card, literally all the 9s I've seen over the past few years have been unappealing for one reason or another, and so I have begun to wonder if finding a really high-end 9 with this card is something of a chimera, and thus enters the temptation to grab the 10. I am admittedly not expert on the amount of unopened product from the Bird/Magic set, but what I have seen is that it is plagued by several issues right out of the pack.
I will def use this poll feature/thread when facing another such collecting quandary; making these choices in a vacuum or even with one or two other trusted opinions can be tough!
I am not sure the $2K your kicking in is necessary. Seems like a fair deal with just the cards, but I was doing really quick math. I might be mistaken.
<< <i>Yankee,
I totally, deeply agree with your assessment of 9s vs 10s; that has actually been my collecting philosophy for some time now. Actually wrote about it at length in some threads a ways back.
Yet with this particular card, literally all the 9s I've seen over the past few years have been unappealing for one reason or another, and so I have begun to wonder if finding a really high-end 9 with this card is something of a chimera, and thus enters the temptation to grab the 10. I am admittedly not expert on the amount of unopened product from the Bird/Magic set, but what I have seen is that it is plagued by several issues right out of the pack.
I will def use this poll feature/thread when facing another such collecting quandary; making these choices in a vacuum or even with one or two other trusted opinions can be tough! >>
+100 for using chimera on a non-D&D Board. fwiw, I tend to be in the camp that says you're giving up too much in this deal.
<< <i>
<< <i>No
I would rather just have all of them and buy a PSA 9 Bird/Magic with part of the 2 k >>
and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub, and then crack and resub, >>
Dodgers collection scans | Brett Butler registry | 1978 Dodgers - straight 9s, homie
<< <i>Hell No! Not even close. You'll regret it. >>
I couldnt agree more. Take the 2K and buy yourself two PSA 9 Bird / Magic rookies.
Joe
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.