1984 Topps Walter Payton
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a676/4a6764bf9b05d545a3bd07de3ed5c379f69a51b3" alt="ClockworkAngel"
This was the card I was most optimistic about on my last submission, from the last group rip from BBCE....and it comes back an 8. I posted a thread not long ago about surface being the most difficult thing to pick up but I sure can't see any flaws. Just don't get this grade...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ccf9/3ccf9ab132693272233a68686c39bcda846a6c39" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ccf9/3ccf9ab132693272233a68686c39bcda846a6c39" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df127/df1277f20bf2fd4ad39c508ed6667b5f0bd4c5aa" alt="image"
The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
TheClockworkAngelCollection
TheClockworkAngelCollection
0
Comments
<< <i>This was the card I was most optimistic about on my last submission, from the last group rip from BBCE....and it comes back an 8. I posted a thread not long ago about surface being the most difficult thing to pick up but I sure can't see any flaws. Just don't get this grade...
Very nice card , but for this particular card , imo the lower right hand corner appears a tad soft . Still a nice card nonetheless .--- Sonny
<< <i>Walter looks like he is confused about the grade as well!!
Thanks for the feedback. What are the flaws you see that bring it down to an 8? For what it's worth, any white specs you see are from the scanner not the card
TheClockworkAngelCollection
TheClockworkAngelCollection
But I think the Mattingly is off center just enough to not get a 10.
Also, does everyone recommend I crack them out of the cases if I do send them in?
TheClockworkAngelCollection
<< <i>Every card you posted is thin on the left side. Not by much, but enough to keep it out of a 10 slab. (my opinion, of course) >>
Agreed.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
<< <i>I dont collect much football, but I love that 84 Payton. Wow. >>
That's the one I am struggling the most with. It's notoriously difficult to find high grade, but this one's a blazer. When I pulled it I thought to myself "at least a 9, might have a slight shot at a 10" and I get an 8?
As for the rest, I appreciate the input regarding centering. You really think they're worse than 40/60?
TheClockworkAngelCollection
That Payton is a beast. I had a 100 card lot of them at one time that yielded one 9. Very very tough card. Unfortunately, yours does look to be in the right holder. Maybe an 8.5 bump but not sure it will find a 9.
...edited to say, that Fouts is one of my favorite cards. Nice card.
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
I am sure we all have stories like this. In my opinion, PSA has been rushing orders and not doing a thorough grading.
I agree that I think the Payton card is slightly tilted, plus may possibly have a tad bit of wear on the (both?) bottom corner(s). Maybe it's just the scan, but from the scan shows I would have to agree with a high-end 8 or very low end 9 assessment.
Also, you mention that any white specs are from the scanner, but they appear to be different on each card? For example, the Fouts card has quite a few white specs around Fouts, behind him, and on the Offensive lineman. But the Mattingly has less and different ones and the Jordan has even less. That could be I suppose from cards going in and out of the scanner or being scanned at different locations of the scanner. Those cards do all look like nice 9s, but it's just hard to say if they should/could be 10s without seeing large scans with no extra specs or anything from the scanner, and also seeing the backs might help as well.
JJacks
Yeah, I don't know what the deal is with my scanner but none of the cards have any white specks. And like I said, I know 60/40 is still supposed to be ok for a 10, and even though none of these are 50/50, I find it hard to believe any of them are worse than 40/60
TheClockworkAngelCollection