PSA Grading - Cracked and Re-Submitted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dd3b/9dd3b44715cad739580e03aafebb3da8afb37118" alt="PFB"
I thought I would share this thw group and get some feedback. I had (2) 85-85 Mario Lemieux RC's in PSA 8. I cracked them to see if PSA was consistent with their grading. The grades posted, the both came back MISCUTS. I called PSA and asked for a re-evaluation of the cards, which they did. Both cards came back as PSA 9's. So, I went from a PSA 8 to MISCUT to PSA 9.
I have done this a couple of times with 86-87 OPC cards. I cracked (4) Gretzky's #3 all 8' - they all came back 9's!
Not sure BGS is any better. I cracked a card and centering went from a 9.5 to an 8.
Seems to me, it's a 50/50 chance when cracking and resubmitting.
PFB on PSA
I have done this a couple of times with 86-87 OPC cards. I cracked (4) Gretzky's #3 all 8' - they all came back 9's!
Not sure BGS is any better. I cracked a card and centering went from a 9.5 to an 8.
Seems to me, it's a 50/50 chance when cracking and resubmitting.
PFB on PSA
PFB
0
Comments
I have a 82 Ripken Traded that I initially sent to BGS. It came back as a trimmed. I didn't think for a moment that the card was trimmed. I then sent it to PSA and it came back a 9. Go figure.
I would love to hear from the PSA defenders how this can happen. Seems to me that PSA got swamped and labeled a bunch of cards as miscut to move the orders along.
Still think PSA is the best, but they are certainly not perfect.
Joe
Lou Gehrig Master Set
Non-Registry Collection
Game Used Cards Collection