Opinion on grading - 1955 commons
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb75/1cb752b51cd300f73eb6c65c09f486dec2dd2d8e" alt="Jakt"
I have a bunch of commons from 1955. Some are in decent shape. Others, not as good.
There are a few that have sharp corners, nice centering, edges look decent, but there is a nice crease somewhere on the front of the card.
My question is, would it make sense to get these graded? From what I am reading, the best they would come back at would be 4-5, and that would be AT BEST.
Normally I would include a scan, but my camera will not pick up on the creases.
Thoughts?
There are a few that have sharp corners, nice centering, edges look decent, but there is a nice crease somewhere on the front of the card.
My question is, would it make sense to get these graded? From what I am reading, the best they would come back at would be 4-5, and that would be AT BEST.
Normally I would include a scan, but my camera will not pick up on the creases.
Thoughts?
I'm building a 1968 and a 1970 Topps set. I have lots of 1970s and 1960s to offer in trade.
0
Comments
<< <i>What would you think the minimum grade (that I think they would come back as) would be worth it to send them in. >>
Not my set, but a quick glance at VCP tells me 5's are about a break-even.
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.