Thinking about Cal Ripken a little
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d15/f5d151ed580488263ecc2b161eaabf5c40061af8" alt="HoneyBadger"
Jeter is superior. Ripken was a longevity guy, the average wasn't all that. Great streak but the longevity put up the numbers, Jeter puts up numbers with talent
0
Comments
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>Bud Harrelson - now that was a shortstop. >>
And a scrappy little fighter. Just ask Pete Rose!
<< <i>One thing I can say about Jeter, he's had some of the hottest beards I've ever seen! >>
<< <i>Ripken was overrated. >>
Good, maybe the price of his cards will go down so I can buy more.
<< <i>Don't look too expensive. Here's a PSA 10 Ripken for $9.99 >>
that's his father genius
IMF
<< <i>Don't look too expensive. Here's a PSA 10 Ripken for $9.99 >>
Oh yeah? Well here's a PSA 10 Jeter for $6.25. Did I win yet?
TheClockworkAngelCollection
<< <i>I realize this a troll thread....but it reminded me of a topic that has crossed my mind. Its interesting to me that a lot of the most highly collected players from the 80's were not highly collected during their prime, at least not in my hood. Specifically players like Ripken and Ozzie Smith. I usually would not separate these guys from the commons. This would have been in the 87-90 era. I think towards the end of this time period I did start to pull out Ripkens but no one really wanted them. Kirby Puckett was also not very collected other than his rookie card. The players that it seems everyone wanted never made the Hall but still have a pretty good following....Mattingly, Gooden, Strawberry, Bo Jackson. >>
As a kid who was into baseball cards in the late 80s and early 90s, Ripken's cards were pretty popular in Sacramento, California. Pulling a Ripken from a 50 cent pack was like pulling a $1 bill (which is quite a bit when you're a kid).
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>Great streak but the longevity put up the numbers, Jeter puts up numbers with talent >>
Ripken's "numbers" compared to the average shortstop from the 80s are superior to Jeter's compared to the average shortstop over the past 20 years. Ripken's defense was one of the best in the league most years. Jeter's has been below average. That is based entirely around talent with nothing to do with longevity