How bad is GAI?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/196dd/196ddbfae99fd62458203a48abd6c452975d7ad0" alt="LuvOldPacks"
Okay, ready for a HUGE can of worms? Here goes - is GAI really THAT bad? I always thought competition was healthy for any business. I know early on, Global Authentication had their problems, but now that Demian Werner has been running things under Global Authority, is it now a good source for grading or does he not have a clue? Does anyone here still submit cards or packs to GAI for grading? (Don't worry, Joe O won't exile you from this chat room if you admit to it.) We do need another pack grading company for sure . . . and I for one hope GAI stays around if they are in fact offering a valid service.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ccf9/3ccf9ab132693272233a68686c39bcda846a6c39" alt="image"
0
Comments
It will fill the niche market for the niche clientele selling a niche product.
<< <i>I always thought competition was healthy for any business. >>
The thing with grading companies is that the product (graded cards) they produce is only as valuable as what collectors are willing to pay for them.
Since GAI has a bad rap, few are willing to buy their product unless they're doing so at a huge discount.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.