For you Shill detectives....1959 PSA 8.5 Mays
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7827f/7827f23a7b14e4ec58bc15915e0150c8cb4c5d70" alt="Mickey71"
Got to be a shill right. Card was sold in April for a very strong price. Is now being sold again. I noticed that the card had very similar wording in the description. What pisses me off...is that I was the underbidder and would have gotten the card for a nice price as there was a big difference in the bids. The wording is the key element for me. The completed auction is the most recent on VCP.
0
Comments
sold April 7th
doesn't look like shilling, necessarily, but certainly not a prudent way to flip a vintage card.
i agree with Dan.
He gambled is what I think.
No wrong in taking a 100.00 loss.
~WalterSobchak
<< <i>Look at the wording style of the auctions. They're basically the same. People don't write and talk alike. >>
yeah, but a knucklehead who overspent might use the same approach to find another knucklehead just like himself.
Bidding looked legit.
Learn Microsoft Excel 2010 and Financial Analysis Skills Using Excel Training
all of his other recent purchases have been sports related, mostly from pretty recognizable names in the eBay seller community.
i think this dude needs to spend some more time improving those financial analysis skills.
Looks like you won on this one.
Wait for the next one.
<< <i>Look at the wording style of the auctions. They're basically the same. People don't write and talk alike. >>
Don't underestimate the power of copy/paste.
Craig knows what I'm sayin'