The new JM 1 ounce bars
Weiss
Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭
were licensed by JM to Sunshine mint, who is actually the producer of these new bars.
Would that influence your decision to buy them?
Would that influence your decision to buy them?
We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
--Severian the Lame
--Severian the Lame
0
Comments
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>yes >>
Positively or negatively?
--Severian the Lame
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
(Just think of city streets clogged with a hundred thousand horses each generating 15 lbs of manure every day...)
<< <i>Why in the heck would it matter? Sunshine makes planchets for ASE's, for Pete's sake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>
But they don't make ASEs.
I don't know. Isn't there a higher standard for PMs? It's the very nature of their existence. Why bother with a maker's mark, literally a hallmark, if it doesn't mean something? If it doesn't mean something, then you don't need the JM design. Make Sunshine bars and leave it at that.
If it DOES mean something, then how can it be applied to a product not actually of that hall/maker?
I personally love this classic JM design. And JM products are the foundation of my Ag bullion hoard. But they could have changed or even improved upon this original iconic design to differentiate it from the originals. Added a manufacture date, the Sunshine equivalent to the Englehard bull, something, anything that would indicate this is New Coke and not the Original recipe.
But the last thing you want in a PM is for it to be inauthentic. In fact, that's the worst thing it can be.
--Severian the Lame
<< <i>Both are well established and reputable firms so I don't see this as a problem. >>
Hint: look at the serial number font
pretty much ruined the brand, or at least made these new bars seen as generic to the die hard old bar buyer...
only the non-"A" bars are the real old jm bars...
<< <i>Link? >>
Product Description
--Severian the Lame
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>I am a huge fan of JM but not these bars. In order to be authentic JM bars they need to be struck at a JM facility. Not just licensed. It has cheapened the brand in my opinion. >>
I'm sure J-M provides oversight and quality control.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
But that doesn't make these JM bars. To me, at least. I feel it does actually cheapen both the bar and the JM brand.
--Severian the Lame
<< <i>And I'm sure Sunshine is reliable.
But that doesn't make these JM bars. To me, at least. I feel it does actually cheapen both the bar and the JM brand. >>
Yes. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>And I'm sure Sunshine is reliable.
But that doesn't make these JM bars. To me, at least. I feel it does actually cheapen both the bar and the JM brand. >>
Being in the fashion industry, I can't avoid to think about that in fashion terms.
Our top line is produced in Italy, doing otherwise would cheapen it.
Though, our other brand produced somewhere else have still the same appeal to the final consumer, thanks to the brand name.
But I agree that JM bars should be produced in a JM facility.
<< <i>And I'm sure Sunshine is reliable.
But that doesn't make these JM bars. To me, at least. I feel it does actually cheapen both the bar and the JM brand. >>
Let's hope BASF (or whoever owns the rights) does not start licensing the Engelhard name.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
<< <i>I'm sure J-M provides oversight and quality control. >>
I would be very much surprised if that was true.
My opinion is that they only rented the rights to the name.
<< <i>I only drink water from Lake Michigan. Once it flows into Lake Huron it isn't as good....... >>
I see you point
<< <i>I only drink water from Lake Michigan. Once it flows into Lake Huron it isn't as good....... >>
You're saying water is water, silver is silver.
If that's the case, there is no reason to use the JM name and logo--Sunshine would be just fine. So why use it?
It seems both JM and Sunshine disagree with the water is water analogy.
Which would you choose for the same money: a JM bar or a 1973 Graduation Day bar?
I suspect the vast majority of the board members would take the JM bar without hesitation. Because silver isn't just silver. Hallmarks mean something to us.
--Severian the Lame
<< <i>
<< <i>I'm sure J-M provides oversight and quality control. >>
I would be very much surprised if that was true. >>
I would be very surprised if it weren't true. J-M would want to protect the integrity of their brand. It's just a prudent business practice.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>I only drink water from Lake Michigan. Once it flows into Lake Huron it isn't as good....... >>
You're saying water is water, silver is silver.
If that's the case, there is no reason to use the JM name and logo--Sunshine would be just fine. So why use it?
It seems both JM and Sunshine disagree with the water is water analogy.
Which would you choose for the same money: a JM bar or a 1973 Graduation Day bar?
I suspect the vast majority of the board members would take the JM bar without hesitation. Because silver isn't just silver. Hallmarks mean something to us. >>
In a bull market, silver is silver and the premiums for "how it looks" shrink, right?
But, now, "how it looks" really matters a lot (for enjoyment while you're holding onto it, and for potential sale liquidity later on) so it's much better if your ounce of silver is "cool", like with a brand name, or a quaint, primitive old pour style, or with a dragon painted on it. That way, someone can try to get more than spot because it's "collectible", and others will be willing to pay it because, if it ain't going up fast in value, at least you can enjoy looking at it.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Yes, silver is silver.
but licensing out one's brand name IMO cheapens the brand name and plants just a little more doubt into the end product. I'm sure there will be some oversight, but how much?? I'm sure it will not be as continuous and rigid as at the original plant/facility. I agree with the above comment, that if silver is just silver, then why license out the brand name? why not just purchase the Sunshine bars and rounds??
I would not be willing to pay additional premium for the new JM bars (in other words, should be the same as Sunshine)
I hope this will not be a new trend... licensing out the brand name. Just wait until..... China obtains the licensing rights to Englehard, etc. !!
I know i'm going to be sad when someone sullies the fair name of the "girls gone wild bars" I'd hate to see the premium come off of those
<< <i>What if Sunshine got rights to produce Engelhard products and decided to produce different size old pour bars like the 3 oz? >>
I would buy several and request that they also produce some 4 and 7 ounce bars.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>What if Sunshine got rights to produce Engelhard products and decided to produce different size old pour bars like the 3 oz? >>
I would buy several and request that they also produce some 4 and 7 ounce bars. >>
PerryHall, just don't ask them to produce any more Engelhard 2 ounce bars.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
For instance, I see in craigslist a repeated sale of 3, 1984 propector coins for $115, that aren't selling. Gives one the impression the selling price is higher, but I've been buying new condition wrapped 82 propector coins for $29.50 and $30. I think the seller would do better using ebay in this case, even with the fees. I just wouldn't buy them above the price I paid now.
Maybe I could get a little more premium 10years from now.
The sunshine made JMs could soften the extra premium a little. Whenever there is something with a little extra value, they will come out with something to take advantage of it.