Common Date Morgan Toner: Should I submit?

nwcoast

This one is really gorgeous in hand. Doesn't look nearly as beat up in hand...
Preparing my first submission of 8 with the coupons from my new CC membership.
Saw the fellow poster asking about his Peace dollar Toner and thought I'd seek the collective opinion of the Forum on this Morgan.
The last of 8.......this one, or something else?
Thanks in advance folks:

lasvegasteddy

too sexy not too...
btw
you should lighten up the obverse image as it's too dark

ModCrewman

I really don't know...but I don't think that one has a very good chance of holdering. I think they'd consider it Questionable Color. But still a very pretty coin.

nwcoast

Thanks VegasTeddy.....
Brightened it up a bit now. Maybe that's better..
The coin is without a doubt NT... They can think whatever they want but given the history of this coin, and much of my collection, I am certain it's not AT.

bestclser1

cute,probably NT,but wouldnt stake my reputation on that picture.Just sayin.

lasvegasteddy

the white shadowing below the date screams nt

nwcoast

Thanks for your vote of confidence.
I know for certain it's NT......Unless they were doing AT prior to 1964 when this coin was buried underground in a hoard I inherited.....

Constantine

I like it alot. Not knocking your photo but I think a better one would do the coin justice.......Therefore, I can see the beauty of it and that raspberry will really pop.

nwcoast

Reshooting it right now.......

airplanenut

<< <i>I really don't know...but I don't think that one has a very good chance of holdering. I think they'd consider it Questionable Color. But still a very pretty coin. >>

Looks like a textbook bag toner to me. Not sure it's worth holdering, but I wouldn't question the color.

bestclser1

<< <i>

<< <i>I really don't know...but I don't think that one has a very good chance of holdering. I think they'd consider it Questionable Color. But still a very pretty coin. >>

Looks like a textbook bag toner to me. Not sure it's worth holdering, but I wouldn't question the color. >>

Somebody put it most correctly!Thanks Jeremy.

lcoopie

NT IMO

60 or 61

nwcoast

Thanks for all the input folks...
Here's a reshoot with softer light. Helps a little but still looks pretty beat up.... I think 60-61 is it too...

Constantine

On the reverse, would that be considered rim damage?

nwcoast

<< <i>On the reverse, would that be considered rim damage? >>



Good question.....It looks pretty beat up in the pic doesn't it? Maybe this would keep it from grading.....
I guessing at this point that I might be better off sending something else and keeping this in my Dansco....

SeattleSlammer

Send 'er in!