I have a 1975 Topps Dan Fouts RC that is PSA 9 and flawless
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a676/4a6764bf9b05d545a3bd07de3ed5c379f69a51b3" alt="ClockworkAngel"
Sometimes it seems to arbirtrary. I swear sometimes I don't get what the difference between a 9 and a 10 is. I have examined this card every which way and can't find a thing wrong
The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
TheClockworkAngelCollection
TheClockworkAngelCollection
0
Comments
Like place a checkbox on the form and you'd pay an extra $1 per card to know why they said NO 10 FOR YOU
If the card is worth enough, you can go the route of cracking -> submit -> receive -> crack -> submit and on and on until you get what you want.
<< <i>I'll pay you PSA 8 price for it!
Couldn't agree more!
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>It would be cool if PSA offered a service where for a small surcharge they will give you a few words on why your card received x grade and whats holding it back from the next grade. They would have gotten hundreds of my dollars already. >>
Opps I quoted the wrong quote before LOL
THIS is what I couldn't agree more with!
TheClockworkAngelCollection
Can't figure out how to show the image or else I would show it
Centering not a problem...ALl my other PSA 9's I think I can find a minor flaw that makes it a 9, but not this one. Centering is beautiful
TheClockworkAngelCollection
<< <i>It would be cool if PSA offered a service where for a small surcharge they will give you a few words on why your card received x grade and whats holding it back from the next grade. They would have gotten hundreds of my dollars already. >>
Send it in for a review sub and it will come back with post it notes showing why they graded it that way.
------
stupid print dots
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
John
RUSH!!!
for having subtle amounts of snow. Let's see a large scan of the card
in question....
<< <i>Check for micro print snow on the front. The Fouts RC is notorious
for having subtle amounts of snow. Let's see a large scan of the card
in question.... >>
Spot on. I have a nice 8...a little oc t/b, but could likely squeeze a 9 for that, but add the show, and its an 8, as it should be. The card photo itself if not very focused, so a little snow doesn't bother me.
I have bought and sold 1000s of graded cards and I don't know how anyone can honestly say, this should be a 10 and claim something is flawless in a slab. You can't really see the edges in the case, and you can't see the surface at all. You can say this is centered very well and the corners are sharp, but I think most would agree, grading covers, or should cover in some cases, more then corners and centering.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
<< <i>"ClockworkAngel" ... Nice!
RUSH!!!
Nice avatar CW! Nice to see a fellow Rush fan here!
Liking Headlong Flight?
Can someone tell me how to post an image? I have it scanned and in my folder ready to sell in eBay, but no URL... the format on this forum is a little different on this message board. How do I put the scan in my post?
TheClockworkAngelCollection
TheClockworkAngelCollection