Even though your images are pretty good the coin is in pretty rough shape & a lot of the attribution points are obscured. This is one of the most difficult years to attribute & many are very similar.
Even though your images are pretty good the coin is in pretty rough shape & a lot of the attribution points are obscured. This is one of the most difficult years to attribute & many are very similar. >>
Well thank you for giving it a try. Yeah the coin definitely has its issues.
JamesM
Posts: 757 ✭
Comments
I'm just taking a WAG it's an S-165.
Even though your images are pretty good the coin is
in pretty rough shape & a lot of the attribution points
are obscured.
This is one of the most difficult years to attribute & many
are very similar.
R.I.P. Bear
<< <i>I'm just taking a WAG it's an S-165.
Even though your images are pretty good the coin is
in pretty rough shape & a lot of the attribution points
are obscured.
This is one of the most difficult years to attribute & many
are very similar. >>
Well thank you for giving it a try.
Yeah the coin definitely has its issues.
i'll go 165 or 179
.
not 100% though. not a fun year to attribute
i will tell ya it can't be any before 165 because of the curls though
.