Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Should maximum bids be disclosed after an auction closes?

MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,412 ✭✭✭✭✭
I just received a Prices Realized List from a European auction firm that lists the prices realized, the highest bids and the number of bids for each lot. I've never seen anything like this degree of disclosure from any auction firm, and I'm wondering if it's a good thing. What do you think?
Andy Lustig

Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.

Comments

  • JamesMJamesM Posts: 757
    I do not think so, a coin is ~worth what 2 people are willing to pay not what the max one person is willing to go.

    Is the information interesting? Sure.
    --- Mayer Numismatics --- Collectors Corner --- (888) 822 - COIN ---
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    I would think revealing such information would have the effect of causing some prices to rise over time, as would-be buyers see what it would have taken to win certain lots and apply this knowledge in future auctions. So I think it would benefit the auction house and consignors.

    On the other hand, any known successful bidder who left a bid on the book or computer would by definition have their max bid revealed to the whole wide world, which to me (and others, I assume) is proprietary information that is no one's business. So I guess if would have the effect of causing people to bid live in the room so as not to tip their hand as to what their max bid would have been - at least that is what I would do.
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,644 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As a buyer, more information is always better.

    The downside for the auction house is that it may reveal that they are not attracting bidders across the board. Maybe Heritage has a larger bidder base for some kinds of material and smaller for others. As a potential consignor I'd like to know that.


  • << <i>I do not think so, a coin is ~worth what 2 people are willing to pay not what the max one person is willing to go.

    Is the information interesting? Sure. >>



    image

  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,454 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agree with CCU. image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I vote no.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,061 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The highest bid meaning the price realized or the highest proxy bid that was not executed because there was no supporting underbid? If the former then this is a price realized list, if the latter then I would have a problem bidding with the company because of the possibility of being run up in the future by those who might know who placed specific bids and who are attempting to generate a competitive advantage.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's a good thing for prospective bidders (especially knowing the number of bids for a given lot). However, I don't understand why an auction house would think that this type of disclosure is in its interest beyond generating some favorable PR.
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,530 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, very interesting...
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • themasterthemaster Posts: 676 ✭✭✭
    Absolutely not. That practice would favor the seller and punish the buyer. An auction company has to balance their service to both sides in order to be successful.

    Have a Great Day!
    Louis
    "If you would know the value of money, go and try to borrow some." Benjamin Franklin
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    So do we now know how much the potted Palm would of bid?
    image
  • ianrussellianrussell Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It would definitely promote the auction agent business and also increase the attendees in person at the auction.

    Btw. I'd expect some consignors to be upset... imagine a coin selling for $1,000 and it had a $25,000 secret max bid on it and the consignor saw it!

    - Ian
    Ian Russell
    Owner/Founder GreatCollections
    GreatCollections Coin Auctions - Certified Coin Auctions Every Week - Rare Coins & Coin Values
  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,515 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would think revealing such information would have the effect of causing some prices to rise over time, as would-be buyers see what it would have taken to win certain lots and apply this knowledge in future auctions. So I think it would benefit the auction house and consignors.

    On the other hand, any known successful bidder who left a bid on the book or computer would by definition have their max bid revealed to the whole wide world, which to me (and others, I assume) is proprietary information that is no one's business. So I guess if would have the effect of causing people to bid live in the room so as not to tip their hand as to what their max bid would have been - at least that is what I would do. >>



    spot on. I would cease bidding via computer or bid sheet and exclusively bid in person or via an agent at the floor auction. The proprietary information I have has some value.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,730 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would think revealing such information would have the effect of causing some prices to rise over time, as would-be buyers see what it would have taken to win certain lots and apply this knowledge in future auctions. So I think it would benefit the auction house and consignors.

    On the other hand, any known successful bidder who left a bid on the book or computer would by definition have their max bid revealed to the whole wide world, which to me (and others, I assume) is proprietary information that is no one's business. So I guess if would have the effect of causing people to bid live in the room so as not to tip their hand as to what their max bid would have been - at least that is what I would do. >>




    either that or do live auction bidding within the bid increments.

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • NewEnglandRaritiesNewEnglandRarities Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would think revealing such information would have the effect of causing some prices to rise over time, as would-be buyers see what it would have taken to win certain lots and apply this knowledge in future auctions. So I think it would benefit the auction house and consignors.

    On the other hand, any known successful bidder who left a bid on the book or computer would by definition have their max bid revealed to the whole wide world, which to me (and others, I assume) is proprietary information that is no one's business. So I guess if would have the effect of causing people to bid live in the room so as not to tip their hand as to what their max bid would have been - at least that is what I would do. >>



    I totally agree.
    New England Rarities...Dealer In Colonial Coinage and Americana
  • dogwooddogwood Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭✭
    The hammer price is the highest bid period.
    The intention of a bidder to keep it going is rendered moot by the lack of the auction house's ability to entice another bidder to play.
    We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the auction house is acting as a bidding proxy, I would consider revealing max bids to be a breach of confidentiality.
  • Absolutely, unequivocally no under any imaginable circumstances.


  • << <i>The hammer price is the highest bid period.
    The intention of a bidder to keep it going is rendered moot by the lack of the auction house's ability to entice another bidder to play. >>



    Agreed. What purpose would it serve to know how much a winning bidder would have gone if pushed. The other party blinked. End of story. If the other party was more interested they should have continued bidding.
    Successful BST with Nolawyer, Whitetornado, Messydesk, whit, lasvegasteddy,cohodk,allcoinsrule, watersport, blackhawk, tonedase, PRoemisch
  • So is long as there is no identifying information attached opening the possibility for someone to be the victim of shill bidding, I don't see any problem with this.
  • I recently won an auction for less than half of my maximum bid. It was an inexpensive item but I still wouldn't have wanted the whole world knowing what I was willing to pay.

    Ron

    image

    Edited to add:

    When you have been looking for a coin for a while and one finally becomes available, we do crazy things sometimes.
    Collect for the love of the hobby, the beauty of the coins, and enjoy the ride.
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,268 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I just received a Prices Realized List from a European auction firm that lists the prices realized, the highest bids and the number of bids for each lot. I've never seen anything like this degree of disclosure from any auction firm, and I'm wondering if it's a good thing. What do you think? >>



    Did it just out the maximum bid or did it also out who made the maximum bid?
    theknowitalltroll;
  • NysotoNysoto Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sheridan Downey has been showing the high mail bid in his MB auction price realized for years, I can't remember anyone complaining about it. I enjoy seeing the information, it is very interesting. The high bid can be double what the winning bid is for some coins. Disclosing the high bid gives better information on how to bid in future auctions, if you really want a coin. I don't believe it necessarily raises prices, as it can also discourage bidders on some coins, knowing there will be a big fish who will pay a crazy price to win.

    Since most coins are won by floor bidders in Heritage-type auctions, disclosing the high mail or internet bid would be of less value.
    Robert Scot: Engraving Liberty - biography of US Mint's first chief engraver
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When TeleTrade relists a coin that didn't sell in a previous listing, do you think they should also include the previous bid info for that coin even if it was sold and returned?
    theknowitalltroll;
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,060 ✭✭✭
    NO!

    image
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,552 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No.

    When you buy an item on eBay, would you want everyone including the seller to know how much you would have paid? I think not.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • The hammer price sometimes does not reflect reality, I'm gonna worry about underbidders?
    There seems to be a great march toward something these days with all these little changes, and I am not sure I like it.

    Eric

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file