Ready for the weekend with a "Guess the Grade" coin??? *Grade revealed in last post

dizzyfoxx

Let's see what the consensus is on this Vancouver?

lasvegasteddy

could ya make it a lil easier...lol
ms67 crowd here i am
very-very nice coin

DennisH

I'm going to say 66 and demonstrate that I don't know zip about grading commems.

LotsoLuck

<< <i>could ya make it a lil easier...lol
ms67 crowd here i am
very-very nice coin >>




+1

ModCrewman

63 shot at 64...hard to judge with photos that big due to visibility of minor flaws.

relicsncoins

You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around.

Broadstruck

For the MS67 crowd here's an actual MS67

notwilight

<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>



Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+

--Jerry

relicsncoins

<< <i>

<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>



Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+

--Jerry >>



Laptop

oneor11

MS-66. Thanks for sharing your coin.

Jacob

Broadstruck

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>You should make the photos smaller, let's say 700X700. It's very difficult to grade from such large photos. At the very least, the entire coin needs to fit on the page so that you can see all of the obverse or reverse without having to scroll around. >>



Fit's on my page. Still using a 15" tube type monitor? 66+

--Jerry >>



Laptop >>



On my MAC I'm only seeing 1/2 of two man hole covers... I'm gonna guess it's MS62/AU58.

LotsoLuck

<< <i>For the MS67 crowd here's an actual MS67

>>




Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look

dizzyfoxx

<< <i>For the MS67 crowd here's an actual MS67

>>



This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67.

Broadstruck

<< <i>This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67. >>



Dizzy a bit early to be drinking

dizzyfoxx

A little smaller pics for the computer monitorly challenged...

Broadstruck

<< <i>Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look >>



Here's ya go Lotsoluck... Some Tires

MS67



MS66



MS65

dizzyfoxx

<< <i>

<< <i>Well blow it up to the size of a car tire and lets take a look >>



Here's ya go Lotsoluck...

>>



Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color.

Broadstruck

<< <i>Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color. >>



Dizzy you must be smoking the good stuff today!!!

Take a good look at the reverse it's flawless... Whereas your frontiersman looks like he was involved in a drive-by shooting

dizzyfoxx

<< <i>

<< <i>Better pics. Definitely 65 technically at best with 67 star power color. >>



Dizzy you must be smoking the good stuff today!!!

Take a good look at the reverse it's flawless... Whereas your frontiersman looks like he was involved in a drive-by shooting >>



The reverse on the "67" may appear to be flawless but it's as smooth as a baby's back side.

Compare the Vancouver that I posted, to the 67 with great toning. The strike on the 67 is far softer in many respects to the OP coin. For example: On the obverse - The definition of the hair and cheekbones as well as the shirt collar. Even more evident on the reverse - with the definition of the frontiersman's beard, face, and coon hat as well as the musculature in his legs and the fort in the background. The difference in the quality of the two strikes is tremendous. The miniscule ticks seem to be about the same.

AnkurJ

Ms66

dizzyfoxx

For the record, regardless of the incredibly weak strike of the 67 that BS posted, I would sure LOVE to own that coin with that gorgeous eye appealing obverse color!!!

Pokermandude

64+, maybe 65 is my guess.

mozin

My guess is PCGS 64. I don't like the business behind the head on the obverse.

relicsncoins

MS63 is my guess.

sawyerjosh

65

RollSearcher

I'm gonna go with 65. Its probably just from looking at the huge pics, but the marks under the A in States and the stuff over the 1825 and 1925 jumps out at me.

LindeDad

I'll pay AU money for any of them.

dizzyfoxx

<< <i>

<< <i>This is an example of a coin that is most likely technically a 64 (maybe 65), but the awsome toning catapults it to a 67. >>



Dizzy a bit early to be drinking >>



Hey Broadstruck, my friend, I was dead sober at the time of my assessment of the Vancouvers. Now that it's after 5 pm, I am now

dizzyfoxx

You gotta love the rattlers. IMO this one should have received the gold bean