Sometimes you cannot tell them apart even in brand-new condition.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
If they cannot determine due to wear, and as Tom says, there's no clear way to tell, I believe PCGS would err on the side of caution and call it a PF30, given the higher mintage of the proofs for that year.
I sold a collection of 3 cent nickels about 4 years ago.
Many of the pieces I sold went to a collector of 3cN's who told me he thought I had a collection of circulated proofs (especially for the tougher dates). I don't know if that's true or not, and I can't recall that Board Member's name, but thought I'd share this as it's the least amount of info I can provide
One of the die pairs for 1884 was used for some of the proofs and all of the business strikes for that year, such that no die characteristics could be identified for sure to distinquish a proof from a business strike. You'd be left, then, to distinguish the 1884 proof from the business strike based on characteristic proof-business strike differences in general for the series. The only possible marker is some subtle evidence of die polishing applied to the reverse in particular before the dies were used for the business strikes.
Clearly, though, all such general distinctions (sharpness of detail in particular) and any polishing evidence would be long gone by the time you're looking at a 30 coin.
(ref: The Ultimate Guide to U.S. Three Cent Nickels" Allan Guifford, 2003)
But are they separated by origin? Or is that just the generic, default grade for circulated pieces?
I would assume that they are not separated by origin, or you would not have asked your original question.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Comments
Sometimes you cannot tell them apart even in brand-new condition.
You have my answer.
I think someone knows something.
Many of the pieces I sold went to a collector of 3cN's who told me he thought I
had a collection of circulated proofs (especially for the tougher dates). I don't
know if that's true or not, and I can't recall that Board Member's name, but
thought I'd share this as it's the least amount of info I can provide
Clearly, though, all such general distinctions (sharpness of detail in particular) and any polishing evidence would be long gone by the time you're looking at a 30 coin.
(ref: The Ultimate Guide to U.S. Three Cent Nickels" Allan Guifford, 2003)
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
<< <i>PCGS has graded 8 coins as VF35 or less.
I think someone knows something. >>
But are they separated by origin? Or is that just the generic, default grade for circulated pieces?
I would assume that they are not separated by origin, or you would not have asked your original question.