Options
Can I get a 64 out of this?

Keep in mind the price over doubles from 63 to 64.
Mark on chin is frost break, die polish lines in field.
Comments?

Mark on chin is frost break, die polish lines in field.
Comments?


Many happy BST transactions
0
Comments
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
but the reverse may hold
it back !!! Good luck !!!
The three weak areas in my mind are the eagle's chest, rev field chatter, and what appear to be some wipe lines in the left upper obv fields. If those are wipe lines
that's why only a 63 as those are not as well tolerated as bag/chatter marks. If not, then I think this coin someday achieve a 64 grade if resubmitted enough times.
I'd sort of grade it 63++/63.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Here is the same year in 64 but a DMPL.
<< <i>What is with all the hairlines in the obverse field? If they are rub it will bb. >>
Lines are die polish.
<< <i>i don't think you would...scatter in reverse fields >>
I agree - the reverse will hold it to a 63.
Click on this link to see my ebay listings.
-Paul
Lance.
<< <i>I think NGC would give it a 64.
Lance. >>
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
<< <i>Lots of hairlines on the upper left field. I am fairly certain those are hairlines and not die polish lines and that date is not known for bearing die polish. May not grade if resubmitted. Coin has a great overall look though. >>
I agree. I don't see those lines anywhere else in the obv fields. And they curve quite a bit in all diff directions...unlike die polish.