Does anyone think these auctions look fishY
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/548ee/548ee8ba58697247a99622e47902c85bb1ec5490" alt="Morgoth"
Here are my reasons
1. Seller's account was dormant for long periods of time and hasn't sold a card over 20 bucks in forever.
2. Claims the high end came from a storage locker, those stories typically are too good to be true.
3. The holders all have whitening on the lower section unless it is just a trick of light from scanning.
4. The Mantle card looks off to me from a color and photo perspective.
52 Mantle
Oh and the choice of cards they have graded versus raw makes no sense.
1. Seller's account was dormant for long periods of time and hasn't sold a card over 20 bucks in forever.
2. Claims the high end came from a storage locker, those stories typically are too good to be true.
3. The holders all have whitening on the lower section unless it is just a trick of light from scanning.
4. The Mantle card looks off to me from a color and photo perspective.
52 Mantle
Oh and the choice of cards they have graded versus raw makes no sense.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
0
Comments