Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Can someone tell me whats up with this Lincoln ?

Were some 1953 lincolns plated ?

image
image

Comments

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Plated as a novelty item;
    not an error of any type.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,178 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Plated as a novelty item;
    not an error of any type. >>

    image
  • garrynotgarrynot Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    My dad used to plate cents just to pass the time. Thank goodness he never did it to anything valuable.
  • MercfanMercfan Posts: 701 ✭✭
    Based on my experience having looked at close to a couple million wheaties, I'd venture a guess that 1953 is the most common date for zinc-plated pre-1959 Lincolns.

    My hypothesis is that some widely used high school chemistry textbook or curriculum came out that year and included a lab exercise involving electroplating a U.S. cent. The selection of 1953 may have been in response to the lab instruction that it be a "new" or "clean and shiny" cent--making those most recently released into circulation overwhelmingly the most frequently used.

    I was only one in 1953, so I hadn't yet enrolled in high school chemistry. Anybody who took chemistry in about 1953 remember such a lab exercise?

    Or, have any of you who've looked at a lot of wheaties seen a different date commonly "silver" plated?

    image
    "Coin collecting problem"? What "coin collecting problem"?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file