NEWP: Washington with color for the 32-64 set.

relicsncoins

Here is my latest purchase. The coin is gorgeous in person, and my photos suck. The luster on this coin is unbelievable and rivals my 1934 in PCGS67. What are your thoughts as to grade and eye appeal?

fastfreddie

66. What's not to like. You'll have to sell me your dups. Love the lustor and tone. Is it odd that it toned on the wing and not the rim edge?

relicsncoins

<< <i>What's not to like. You'll have to sell me your dups. Love the lustor and tone. Is it odd that it toned on the wing and not the rim edge? >>



It's toned to the edge, the glare on the slab is preventing the color from coming through.

MikeInFL

Very clean coin and if the luster is as nice as you suggest, it seems to be a nice coin.

I'd grade the coin 66 for a touch of splotchiness (sp?), and I don't see this coin in a PCGS 67 slab for the same reason.

IMO of course.

panther

I almost bought that coin when he lowered the price.

It is to hard to capture the right color and luster of quarters.

I bet it would look great with a trueview picture of it.

I bet it will cross to PCGS