3 raw Lincolns 1909-SVDB, 1909-S, & 1914-D. What do you think?

I'm looking for opinions on the 3 raw Lincolns I just picked up. Any thoughts on them, what they might grade, problems, authenticity, etc. Really anything interesting you might have to say
I got these from a folder I bought that had all the keys. Going to submit them unless I get big red warning signs from you guys.
1909-S:
Large Image
1914-D:
Large Image
1909-S VDB:
Large Image

1909-S:

1914-D:

1909-S VDB:

GMan
0
Comments
Drunner
<< <i>1909-S might be questionable on certifying due to environmental damage. The other two look fine . .
Drunner >>
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
The other two don't spend the money on them.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
<< <i>I don't think that 1909-S is real >>
I agree. The other two look fine.
-Paul
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't think that 1909-S is real >>
I agree. The other two look fine.
-Paul >>
I wouldn't think anyone would fake a 1909-S Lincoln, so my guess is that it's genuine. The biggest concern is the scratch on the 1914-D near the bottom of the obverse. However, I think it will still grade.
1909-S = F12 Details - Damaged (surface nicks & discoloration)
1914-D = F15 / Net VG10 (minor flaws & weakly struck reverse)
1909-S VDB = Solid VF20.
<< <i>Here's how I would grade them:
1909-S = F12 Details - Damaged (surface nicks & discoloration)
1914-D = F15 / Net VG10 (minor flaws & weakly struck reverse)
1909-S VDB = Solid VF20. >>
I was thinking similar - 09S I wouldn't send it unless you don't care about having a "genuine."
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
<< <i>1909-s looks like its been thru a fire. >>
I've been laughing at this comment all morning