Does it fit the grade or is it undergraded?

BPorter26

I just picked this card up and wanted to get your opinion on this card. I feel it's under graded, because the front of the card is so nice. The back is MC, but should that effect the grade that much and to have a qualifier added. This is a tough card to find centered. Does it fit the grade of 6MC or do you think it should be a 5 or even 5.5?

This is mine


This looks just like the one I bought.
Layne of Ebay

6MC in a registry set

MBMiller25

That lane looks at least as nice as the PSA 5 on EBAY. That card is notoriously cut like that on the back. I think I would resub that card and see what you get. I think you have at least a PSA 5 in that card.

mealeworm

I actually think the card looks over graded. The corners look really soft for a 6.

I dont think it would ever be NQ because of the actual name being cut off.

I have seen some issues that have horrible backs sometimes over look the back when considering qualifers. 55 Bowman comes to mind.

Just my .02 still a really nice looking card.

JoeBanzai

Top two corners on your card look pretty "dinged" to me. I think the card is well graded and would not chance cracking it out, might easily come back a 5MC.

As far as miss-cut qualifiers go, I think it's all or nothing. In other words the one in the Registry Set you link to is BADLY miss-cut both front and back (I am assuming the back is also bad) gets the qualifier as do the other two.

Either way your card is VERY attractive! I would not say undergraded.

Joe

BPorter26

So does the back of the card warrant a qualifier? I understand completely if it was the front of the card, but the back. I guess I don't understand why the lack of consistency on this card.

Brick

Miscut qualifier can be for back of card. I had a 55 Fowler nicely centered on front, back miscut. Had the qualifier.

tsalems1

I think the card listed on Ebay should have a (MC) qualifier. It should not have a straight grade being clearly miscut