I wonder if this Trade $ has been worked a bit since it was graded.

relicsncoins · January 11, 2012 3:21AM

If you look at the photos from the certificate, you can see what appears to be toning on the lower half the reverse. The closeup of the coin does not show that toning.

PerryHall · January 11, 2012 3:24AM

Without an in-hand examination, I wouldn't even say that coin goes with that certificate.

Unknown · January 11, 2012 3:40AM

This content has been removed.

relicsncoins · January 11, 2012 7:04AM

<< <i>How about a bigger close-up of the obv, kind of like the rev pic you put up, so we make no assumptions. >>

There ya go.

AUandAG · January 11, 2012 8:48AM

Someone took the liberty of dipping that baby. Waaaaay too much, too!

bob

Kove · January 11, 2012 9:16AM

It would be very odd to take a coin with a photo certificate, change the appearance of that coin by dipping it, and yet keep the photo together with the coin proving that the coin had been changed.

If that is really the coin pictured in the photo certificate, that's very strange.

DoubleEagle59 · January 11, 2012 9:21AM

Looks like the exact same coin to me.

But it seems to have made one or two trips to the dip jar after the original Anacs cert was done.

jesbroken · January 11, 2012 9:21AM

Perhaps the angle of the lighting is the culprit. I almost imagine the outline of the discoloration in the closeup photo of the reverse. JMO
Jim

I wonder if this Trade $ has been worked a bit since it was graded.

Comments

Leave a Comment