Image opinions needed, grading opinions?

Any comments on these images? I have now purchased new lighting so the images have plenty of clean light.
Any ideas how I can improve them?
The coin is graded and just returned from CAC with a green bean.

Any ideas how I can improve them?
The coin is graded and just returned from CAC with a green bean.


I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
0
Comments
size is good, clarity is off, camera shake/overexposed?
you are on the right track
there are more than a few threads in the forum on photography, i recommend going through some of them
as a minimum, half of the benefit of this forum is the archives
keep up the good work
it is taking away from the over all beauty of the coin if it has any. MOO
All in all it is a nice picture and Beaut of a coin. I'd say 64 or 65
<< <i>63? >>
If you have 63's that look like this are you interested in selling any of them?
Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.
Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
White balance is easy to adjust. But start with the right camera setting for the lighting you use.
I like the photos and you're doing very well. Focus needs a little work.
Pretty Morgan. Bummer about the holder.
Lance.