Options
Re: Ethics Question
coinman23885
Posts: 1,126
I see that I was wrong in viewing a hypothetical situation as unethical; it appears to be an accepted practice. This is precisely why I asked, for a neutral, objective point of view. Thank you all for your help!
0
Comments
"Money does not care about speeches on morality. Capital asks whether the rules will remain the same tomorrow. With inflation, people assume price is the problem, and propose regulation—but price is simply the message." - Martin Armstrong
<< <i>I would never do this personally, but do you consider selling and describing a coin (for a sales ad) which you have never formally purchased (i.e. money hasn't changed hands yet) ethical? I DO NOT think that it is ethical, but I heard someone take a contrary position the other day. I want to make sure that I don't have an incorrect sense of ethics here. >>
Any coin on consignment would fail your ethics standard. This would affect an enormous number of folks in the hobby-industry.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>
<< <i>I would never do this personally, but do you consider selling and describing a coin (for a sales ad) which you have never formally purchased (i.e. money hasn't changed hands yet) ethical? I DO NOT think that it is ethical, but I heard someone take a contrary position the other day. I want to make sure that I don't have an incorrect sense of ethics here. >>
Any coin on consignment would fail your ethics standard. This would affect an enormous number of folks in the hobby-industry. >>
Maybe I should clarify my hypothetical. I am referring to an owner who has never taken physical possession and who portends to sell the coin with an accurate description without disclosing the fact that the seller has never held the coin in his or her hands.
<< <i>Maybe I should clarify my hypothetical. I am referring to an owner who has never taken physical possession and who portends to sell the coin with an accurate description without disclosing the fact that the seller has never held the coin in his or her hands. >>
Why would it matter if the owner/seller of the coin has never held the coin in his or her hands before selling it, and why would it be unethical to do so?
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Portends?
I would not do this. But I guess I don't have a problem if it were an ASE or other high-grade modern. The flipper sounds a little desperate.
Lance.
<< <i>If the description is accurate, what difference does it make whether or not the owner has actually held the coin in his hands? >>
How does the owner know the description is accurate without seeing the coin in hand? Pics can be altered and even if they aren't they can be misleading.
"Money does not care about speeches on morality. Capital asks whether the rules will remain the same tomorrow. With inflation, people assume price is the problem, and propose regulation—but price is simply the message." - Martin Armstrong
<< <i>How does the owner know the description is accurate without seeing the coin in hand? >>
I don't know- by going with the trusted opinion of someone who has seen the coin? Anyway, that's what the OP stipulated: "I am referring to an owner who has never taken physical possession and who portends to sell the coin with an accurate description..."
On the other hand, most retail coin dealers have at least a smattering of consignment coins in their inventory and are usually fairly transparent about the arrangement.
<< <i>
<< <i>If the description is accurate, what difference does it make whether or not the owner has actually held the coin in his hands? >>
How does the owner know the description is accurate without seeing the coin in hand? Pics can be altered and even if they aren't they can be misleading. >>
This is the reason I was asking; it seemed odd to portray a description as your own if you cannot speak on the technical merits of a coin.
<< <i>This is the reason I was asking; it seemed odd to portray a description as your own if you cannot speak on the technical merits of a coin. >>
If you bought a coin that was not as described, you should return it for a refund. You did confirm there was a return option before buying, right?
<< <i>
<< <i>This is the reason I was asking; it seemed odd to portray a description as your own if you cannot speak on the technical merits of a coin. >>
If you bought a coin that was not as described, you should return it for a refund. You did confirm there was a return option before buying, right? >>
I promise that I didn't make any purchases of a coin based on a bogus description! It's just a question that I have been pondering over the last few hours after a discussion with another collector.