Why this Morgan did not get at least a PL?

SNMAN

MORGAN


?????

tightbudget

The reverse is holding it back from getting anything. Would probably star at NGC though.

kryptonitecomics

The better question would be how the heck the seller deciding that a common date in MS63 is worth $175 bucks He is trying to get MS64DMPL money out of a coin with no designation what so ever......

WTCG

To qualify for a PL designation both sides have to be proof like. That coin is mirrored only on the obverse.

AUandAG

tightbudget called it. The reverse holds it back. One sided DMPL.

bob

DennisH

Semi-PL reverse.
Pretty coin, though.

TheBigB

I have an NGC star Morgan that looks like that.

SeattleSlammer

If the obverse cameo in-hand is really as good as the pic, then I don't think $175 is too far off. Truly black and white cameos are few and far between. True Moose cameos regularly go for big premiums.

kryptonitecomics

<< <i>If the obverse cameo in-hand is really as good as the pic, then I don't think $175 is too far off. Truly black and white cameos are few and far between. True Moose cameos regularly go for big premiums. >>




I agree...I just don't think a one sided PL or DMPL coin in MS63 is worth anywhere near $175 and I would imagine the coin will sit on ebay unsold for quite some time at that price but who knows

golfer72

Hard to tell from the pix. I have Morgans graded DMPL that have less PL qualities than others graded PL. The coin is worth what the market will bear regardless of the label.