Why was 1973 so popular for silver "Art Bars"
tydye
Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
It seems like the vast majority of art bars are from this year. Anyone know why? I was only 3 at the time.
0
Comments
I recall visiting my local coin shop at the time. My interest was in buffalo nickels, mercury dimes, etc. Others were collecting 1 ounce silver bars with all sorts of themes. Some even sought out what they called "error" bars. My LCS must have had scores of different designs.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
<< <i>Think of it as a fad that quickly waned.
I recall visiting my local coin shop at the time. My interest was in buffalo nickels, mercury dimes, etc. Others were collecting 1 ounce silver bars with all sorts of themes. Some even sought out what they called "error" bars. My LCS must have had scores of different designs. >>
Yeah, it was a fad fueled by cheap silver. Harry Forman was promoting them heavily in Coin World.
<< <i>Thanks for the info. How much were these selling for in 1973? >>
My recollection is a tad fuzzy but $4 to $5 each seems about right.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
It was hot, by then-current standards, and people wanted to buy, BUY, BUY!!!!!!!!!
So silver has been a 10-bagger in only 38 years (1973-2011)!
Except that the consumer price index (CPI) has been a 5-bagger during that same period. So in real terms, silver has been only a 2-bagger in 38 years.
Except that the CPI has been manipulated for years to understate actual increases in the average cost of living.
So it's entirely possible that the purchasing power of an ounce of silver is about the same as it was in 1973!
My Adolph A. Weinman signature
-----
Because of ambiguity in the laws ( NORFED is still being prosecuted) 'art' bars which were just .995 or better silver bullion were safe and convenient. And not illegal. Today, the idea that owning precious metals would get you locked up seems ridiculous. Not then. Many of us still suffered from prohibition 'hangover'. The law was gray, not black and white. Analagous to MMJ today perhaps.
---
So the 'explosion' as it were of art bars back then may have been due to a combination of those factors. And $4 was more than the average Jane/Joe was making per hour back then. But we owned our own house, operated motor vehicles, recreated, and generally enjoyed the trappings of prosperous folks. And if we were doing well, we bought an art bar or two. As an investment, an art piece, a hedge against inflation, name your motivation.............
<< <i>I think it was the economic uncertainty of the times when OPEC created the first oil crisis. (politics aside, they didn't 'create' it, we did. By refusing to concede a bit we forced them to demand it all) That was the first post-WWII seemingly-foreign-caused economic uncertainty that seriously threatened our theretofor complacent post-WWII 'of course we're top-dog' reality. That newly created uncertainty engendered a desire to return to specie as a fundamental. Inflation was wicked. If owning gold wasn't still illegal, I believe that most of us at that time still belived that it was.
-----
Because of ambiguity in the laws ( NORFED is still being prosecuted) 'art' bars which were just .995 or better silver bullion were safe and convenient. And not illegal. Today, the idea that owning precious metals would get you locked up seems ridiculous. Not then. Many of us still suffered from prohibition 'hangover'. The law was gray, not black and white. Analagous to MMJ today perhaps.
---
So the 'explosion' as it were of art bars back then may have been due to a combination of those factors. And $4 was more than the average Jane/Joe was making per hour back then. But we owned our own house, operated motor vehicles, recreated, and generally enjoyed the trappings of prosperous folks. And if we were doing well, we bought an art bar or two. As an investment, an art piece, a hedge against inflation, name your motivation............. >>
That makes sense to me. I did not think about it from that standpoint.
<< <i>It seems like the vast majority of art bars are from this year. Anyone know why? I was only 3 at the time. >>
Coin collecting pushed aside stamp collecting in the early 1960's. Everyone was collecting coins. Then the government made coins 'boring' by taking the silver out of them, and perpetuating a bunch of stale old designs in the coins that did circulate.
People started collecting medals from the Franklin Mint (anyone remember them?) for the funky designs, historical & patriotic topics. But most of their stuff was sterling ( .925 fine silver), and a bunch of odd weights (500 grams, 1000 grams, to name just a few). When people started to worry about inflation in the 1970's demand shifted to 999 fine silver, denominated in easy to understand Troy weights.
<< <i>
<< <i>It seems like the vast majority of art bars are from this year. Anyone know why? I was only 3 at the time. >>
Coin collecting pushed aside stamp collecting in the early 1960's. Everyone was collecting coins. Then the government made coins 'boring' by taking the silver out of them, and perpetuating a bunch of stale old designs in the coins that did circulate.
People started collecting medals from the Franklin Mint (anyone remember them?) for the funky designs, historical & patriotic topics. But most of their stuff was sterling ( .925 fine silver), and a bunch of odd weights (500 grams, 1000 grams, to name just a few). When people started to worry about inflation in the 1970's demand shifted to 999 fine silver, denominated in easy to understand Troy weights. >>
Actually, I think the weights on the Franklin Mint bars were 500 grains and 1000 grains of .925 fine silver based on what I have seen in the past. 500-gram and 1000-gram bars would be very big Franklin Mint silver art bars.
Because this was the first year that I bought Silver...I'm a trendsetter.
My non-smart arse answer is because it's like anything else, there was opportunity to cash in on an available "thing". Talk about the economics at the time all you want, but it came down to opportunity. Why were beanie babies crazy for a few years? because it was a "thing" that everyone had to have at the time. I really think it's as simple as that. jmho