1825 Large Cent - Assistance Attributing

LanceNewmanOCC

.
.
I've been looking at 1825s for too long and need your assistance.

Using star 6 and 10, the date orientation and the S @ top of rev wreath, I cannot get this sucker to line up to save my life with the 10 known varieites

Have attributed numerous large cents correctly, and verified by sending to B.Grellman, but this one is making me work for it

was excited to see i have an 1825 N-1 F+ (not the one shown) that has been at SDB for many many months and just decided to get into my 80 large cents to do some brush-up attribution work

also for my fellow EAC geeks, the new issue of P-wise has some phenomenal articles in it, you should take some time and look at the info for top collections ever known assembled

also you can take a gander at C. Harker with some EAC peeps @ 2011 summer seminar

LanceNewmanOCC

.
.
just realized i am missing my N-5 image, watch it turn out to be that one,

if I confirm before anyone posts, I'll let you know
.
.

LanceNewmanOCC

.
.
nope

CQR doesn't even list an n-5 nor the D. Holmes catalog,

back to the drawing board
.
.

Edscoin

N 8 ?

TPRC

N-7 (R-3) VG+ details, w/ obv scratches. Net G-6

LanceNewmanOCC

.
.
thank you for the input thus far
.
.
i was thinking the same coin but star 6 on my coin is pointing too far down in my opinion, could just be the point is worn or not struck fully.
.
.
certainly open to discussion, and actually prefer the back and forth for learning
.
.

LanceNewmanOCC

<< <i>N 8 ? >>



it is one of the others i was considering

the "S" on the reverse, 2nd "S" in states is a little too far clockwise for the leaf below it, very minute difference to be sure
.
.

joecopper

I agree with N7

MsMorrisine

was there ever a final verdict?

joecopper

Ms -- I reviewed again - position of the leaf well past the "F", the large center dot on rev., dentil fusing beginning stars 9-11, and what appears to possibly be re-punching on 5 say N7 to me.

LanceNewmanOCC

.
thanks for the assistance

it is enjoyable going back and forth will someone debating the correct attribution for varieties

on a side note:

awe, isn't that lovely, now i can't find the darn thing ><

and to boot, yes i am still awake, grrrr
.