I always loved all the Mustangs I've owned over the years!
1966, 1967, 1968, 1988.
As for the implications, from what I understand, a numbers matching car is exactly that. All the Numbers which have been documented as avilable for the years of production must match so I don't really see any threat to the Mustang Collectors of America.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
From a safety point of view, I wonder if the "new" cars need to have seat belts and airbags installed...which wouldn't be a bad thing...but which would preclude using the original thin steering wheel assembly.
"government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
I always thought that it would be neat if the mint would buy up old worn out Morgans, melt them and use the silver alloy to restrike the series; one business strike and one proof.
Comments
I always loved all the Mustangs I've owned over the years!
1966, 1967, 1968, 1988.
As for the implications, from what I understand, a numbers matching car is exactly that. All the Numbers which have been documented as avilable for the years of production must match so I don't really see any threat to the Mustang Collectors of America.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>How would you like a Mint produced reproduction (right down to the year) of a classic coin? >>
Who needs the Mint when you have China?
...linkified
<< <i>
<< <i>How would you like a Mint produced reproduction (right down to the year) of a classic coin? >>
Who needs the Mint when you have China? >>
Funny, but true.
Austrian "1780" Maria Theresa thalers and "1915" ducats and 4-ducat pieces come to mind.