First Orders™ label
messydesk
Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
In the age of paying extra money for silly designations to appear on a label, do you think people would pay extra for a First Orders™ designation to appear on a holder if their sealed-box coins had order numbers from the mint that were among the first 10% of the orders for the series? Would they pay extra for the actual order number to appear? Would the secondary market care? This could be a good way for PCGS to expand the services that keep the costs of the services I find more useful from increasing too rapidly.
John
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
0
Comments
Repetition of ignorance is ignorance raised to the power two.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
they are first strikes if you consider some issues sell well into the year.
<< <i>First Orders would be completely meaningless...
Of course it would, but that wasn't one of my questions.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>How about a First Thread™ designation, for the first thread to discuss a new coin or issue.
Now, I'd pay good money for that!