Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

THIS IS A PSA 8.5??? - OPINIONS?

Saw this in the Goodwin auction and had to question how it ever got the 1/2 point bump?

According to PSA:

Cards that exhibit high-end qualities within each particular grade, between PSA Good 2 and PSA Mint 9, may achieve a half-point increase. While PSA graders will evaluate all of the attributes possessed by a card in order to determine if the card may be eligible, there will be a clear focus on centering.

Generally speaking, a card must exhibit centering that is 5-10% better, at minimum, than the lowest % allowed within a particular grade. It is important to note that there may be cases where the overall strength of the card, such as the quality of the corners and print, will give the card the edge it needs despite the fact that it may exhibit only marginal centering for the grade. This is especially true for cards that find themselves within the bottom half of the PSA 1-10 scale.

Finally, keep in mind that qualifiers will not apply to grades that achieve the half-point increase since, by definition, these cards have to exhibit high-end qualities within the grade in order to warrant consideration. For example, there will not be cards graded PSA NM-MT-Plus 8.5 OC or PSA EX-MT-Plus 6.5 PD since the half-point is reserved for high-end cards within each grade.


So if there is a clear focus on centering then I feel like the L/R centering of this example should probably remove it from being considered for the extra 1/2 point.
The only thing I can guess is that this is a 9 (OC) but it was submitted with a request for "no qualifiers" no it came back as an 8.5.

Any thoughts?



link

http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotDetail.aspx?lotid=21028&searchby=0&searchvalue=None&page=6&sortby=0&displayby=2&lotsperpage=100&category=1&seo=1963-Topps-Rookie-Stars,-Pete-Rose-Rookie-#537-PSA-8.5-NM-MT+


Dave

Comments

  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    it's not a 9(OC).

    more than anything else, i can't deal with the white tips on the blue at the top.

    if the card fits within all parameters, then the grade makes sense.

    i've seen a world of variations within the point 5 system, and centering is NOT the only consideration being applied.
  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭
    I think the only thing holding that card back from a 9 is the corners....There is a CU member that has a 8.5 that looks nicer (cant recall his name) but he had it up for sale recently. Here is my 8 to compare the centering difference. I dont like the blue/yellow bleed or the fisheyes...but the centering is nice.
    image
  • Morning,

    That card IN MY Opinion is the ONLY reason that PSA should use the 1/2 point system. That is one of the clearest examples of an 8.5+ I think is out there. Absolutely spot on Grading !!!image

    Neil
    Actually Collect Non Sport, but am just so full of myself I post all over the place !!!!!!!
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,950 ✭✭✭✭
    Between the corner dings, the fish eyes, the slight tilt cut, and Ken McMullen's butt-chin, that thing is a 7 all day.

    image
    image
  • Scottiec2288Scottiec2288 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭
    mrmint, how is the centering on back t/b? looks a little off..
  • Scottiec2288Scottiec2288 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭
    No Way that is an 8.5 i agree psa 7..i have a psa 7 thats better then that card!!!!
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,950 ✭✭✭✭
    Scottiec2288's Rose:

    image
    image
    image
  • Scottiec2288Scottiec2288 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Jeff, i guess i should crack out and hope for grader 170, maybe i'll get 8.5 too!! Mine don't have all the tiny dots all over card, i'm sorry but that is an ugly 8.5 and wouldn't pay extra for that card..
  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭
    Scottie has a very very nice card but PSA seems to really place a premium on side to side centering on this card...I think the huge scan makes this card look worse than it would in hand.
  • Scottiec2288Scottiec2288 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭
    I agree mine is off side to side a little but so is the 8.5, thats how this thread got started, thats why i never resubbed..This psa 8.5 should not be 8.5 in my opinion. I like your psa 8 better then this 8.5, it maybe a little off top/bottom but looks like a solid 8..
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    perhaps another consideration here is something none of us can really truly examine.....when you send in a raw card to PSA for grading, there is as much of a premium placed on the so-called "newness" or crispiness of the card as much as anything else.....if you sub cards regularly, then you would quite likely understand the difference once the card is actually placed in the slab.

    you can no longer touch it. but that aspect counts BIG in grading.

    that's why, regardless of any conjecture we share here, there is absolutely nothing like having any or all of those slabs in hand. or any other card from any other thread.

    it would then be much easier to justify or NOT justify the assigned grade.
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 12,005 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I send that card in, it's a 7. The white showing through on the top corners is too much, the centering is nice enough, but not to give it a half point jump. My thoughts are this card would be an average 8 at the very best.

    Joe
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
Sign In or Register to comment.