t206 back variations
qdoggmets
Posts: 9
hi,
I have sent 2 requests to psa in regards to starting to tag t206 cards with a proper and full card back variation including subject count of the brand, factory and district.
they don't seem overly willing to adapt and track these variations even though they manage and do such for newer cards.
I guessed that they would have been more receptive to this considering cert number 1 is the wagner and it is the most notariable set in almost all of the industries but they are proving me wrong.
Has anyone else mentioned this to them and hit the same reluctancy?
Please post your thoughts and setiments on lack of recognition to the t206 true variations as well as whether or not you think it is important for them to distinguish the cards and their populations at such granularity.
Thanks,
kevin
I have sent 2 requests to psa in regards to starting to tag t206 cards with a proper and full card back variation including subject count of the brand, factory and district.
they don't seem overly willing to adapt and track these variations even though they manage and do such for newer cards.
I guessed that they would have been more receptive to this considering cert number 1 is the wagner and it is the most notariable set in almost all of the industries but they are proving me wrong.
Has anyone else mentioned this to them and hit the same reluctancy?
Please post your thoughts and setiments on lack of recognition to the t206 true variations as well as whether or not you think it is important for them to distinguish the cards and their populations at such granularity.
Thanks,
kevin
0
Comments
Nick
Reap the whirlwind.
Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
m
Ok. I see your point but i think you partially missed mine. Its not entirely about the taking the time to flip it over. I would like to add flipping it over online is impossible. You have to email...and wait 24 hours. Back recognition would bring the hobby to recognize the importance of it. I digress....
Some of the subject backs have much lower populations of the same card in a same pose with a different subject back. My point was that....how can you recognize newer cards as 1/1 and do population and pricing on them but not do it it properly for the "Set of all sets". To me it is an abomination to the hobby to not have these recognized as different cards.
I understand that there are business reasons but the fact is there are defenitely differences that need to be recognized.
The question is why do this for topps 2010 super triple die cut mantle fake auto combined with julius irving game used shoe rubber whatever..... game used garbage people collect now adays and not the t206 set.
Essentially my point is that the hobby is not recognizing the clear distinction that they are different cards.
At what point does anything that is different on a card become a variation an error or a completely seperate card worth noting as a seperate card. We are not talking about a printing problem or mistake.
Closer: We are talking about clearly intended and indicated differences in the card in quantities that can not be ignored.
Kevin
However it is an excellent idea. PSA notes variations on lots of other examples.
I would think most seller would note the back as it isso important.
PSA could offer a reholder similar to cracked case. Ithink anyone who ownes a T206 card can afford and would want the service.
1948-76 Topps FB Sets
FB & BB HOF Player sets
1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets