Home U.S. Coin Forum

Major die cracks or retained cuds. Which are these?

OnWithTheHuntOnWithTheHunt Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭✭✭
Reverses of both coins are normal, if that makes a difference.
image
Proud recipient of the coveted "You Suck Award" (9/3/10).

Comments

  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭✭

    I think they are both retained cuds because the ends touch the rim of the coin.

    Of course, I could be wrong image
  • This content has been removed.
  • errormavenerrormaven Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭
    The crack appears to show slight vertical displacement. That is one of the diagnostic criteria for a retained cud.
    Mike Diamond is an error coin writer and researcher. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A purist could say these are not retained cuds, however, they have 100%+ potential to be one.. so basically they are. It's interesting how the the dies failed in almost the exact same way so many years apart. Cool pieces!
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would call these both examples of retained cuds.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file