Courtesy of Stephanie-Wild 96 PL GTG-3 pics

bestclser1 · October 8, 2011 1:20PM

DRUNNER · October 8, 2011 1:22PM

Guessing 65PL. Nice coin!

Drunner

fivecents · October 8, 2011 1:24PM

MS64

coinsarefun · October 8, 2011 2:03PM

One of my favorites......enjoy

I always loved the stike through on the obverse, it looks like she has a wild streak in her hair

halfhunter · October 8, 2011 2:35PM

64-PL

HH

PQueue · October 8, 2011 6:26PM

Nice, but I can't see anything higher than 63 with that reeding mark.

STONE · October 8, 2011 9:51PM

Who says it needs to be Unc...and definitely not PL from that image...nor does it look NT.

AU-55 to me...then again I don't have the coin in hand to see if it's a weak strike or not!

bestclser1 · October 9, 2011 8:41AM

Gee Winston who pissed in your wheaties this morning.?

golfer72 · October 9, 2011 7:38PM

<< <i>Who says it needs to be Unc...and definitely not PL from that image...nor does it look NT.

AU-55 to me...then again I don't have the coin in hand to see if it's a weak strike or not! >>

You can tell PL or not from a photo but not strike? Huh?

astrorat · October 9, 2011 8:46PM

64* PL

bestclser1 · October 10, 2011 1:58AM

Just a plain old 64,needs to be regraded,my grade 65*PL,worst case 64+PL

bestclser1 · October 10, 2011 1:59AM

<< <i>64* PL >>

I live by your sigline my friend.

7Jaguars · October 10, 2011 2:36AM

How much luster in the not-wildly toned AT looking areas?

Very hard to grade with the usual have to be seen in hand caveats.
Maybe, maybe 63, PL in parts but enough to call it above that, I can' t anyway.

roadrunner · October 10, 2011 2:51AM

64+ PL seems highest probably to me. Numerous delaminations in the fields and the flattish obv strike detract somewhat. Odd how the "X" shaped area of obv
striking weakness are bathed in that light silvery brown coloration.

roadrunner

coinsarefun · October 10, 2011 3:03AM

*** edit to add........it is an EOR toning***

Its a very difficult coin to image and Todd did well with trying to capture the toning.

This is the type of coin that many dealers would say....dip it and it will grade prooflike.

This is also the type of coin that you have to decide to show its prooflike qualities or show of its toning. No way to show both in the same image!

In hand it is very PL. But since the obverse has so much toning, I doubt it will grade PL.
Though it should.....IMO. The reverse is definitely PL and Todd captured that as you can not see any cartwheel luster, just dark fields.

Also, regarding the obverse.......behind the hair....its NOT a reeding mark as anyone can easily see it is a stuck through.
Doesn't even look like a reed mark

Anyways, being such a large image does tend to show its flaws, but in hand its beautiful, very much like a diamond that when rolled back and forth
it shows its true luster, depth, mirrors and color.

Here are a few more images that I did not include in the auction.

Lloyd you have an awesome Morgan there and if you EVER decide to sell it please give me first crack at it

Stefanie

littlebear · October 10, 2011 4:00AM

Nice coin, Lloyd!

Larry L.

bestclser1 · October 10, 2011 8:12AM

Steph,You definitely get first shot.This coin is almost MOOSELY.

fivecents · October 18, 2011 12:39PM

<< <i>Just a plain old 64,needs to be regraded,my grade 65*PL,worst case 64+PL >>

AnkurJ · October 18, 2011 12:58PM

Nice coin, but im just not a fan of the toning pattern.

bestclser1 · October 19, 2011 11:33PM

Actually,either am i usually,but the mirrors,the colors the date and the price,were too much NOT to buy it.Best,LC

al410 · October 20, 2011 12:16AM

Beautiful Morgan!!!!! Thanks for showing it

AL

Courtesy of Stephanie-Wild 96 PL GTG-3 pics

Comments

Leave a Comment