Should You Follow Soros Out of Gold?
goingbroke
Posts: 1,410
Investors can’t seem to get enough of stories talking about what this or that famous investor is doing with his or her portfolio. In the latest example, news that George Soros has liquidated his gold holdings has some investors and commentators wondering whether the markets are looking at the end of an impressive run in gold. Whether Soros is right or wrong with this latest move, investors ought to consider some of the reasons to reject or copy his move.
For the regular investor, it’s a sure way to get poor quickly
For the regular investor, it’s a sure way to get poor quickly
Many successful BST transactions ajia
(x2,Meltdown),cajun,Swampboy,SeaEagleCoins,InYHWHWeTrust, bstat1020,Spooly,timrutnat,oilstates200, vpr, guitarwes,
mariner67, and Mikes coins
(x2,Meltdown),cajun,Swampboy,SeaEagleCoins,InYHWHWeTrust, bstat1020,Spooly,timrutnat,oilstates200, vpr, guitarwes,
mariner67, and Mikes coins
0
Comments
Protectors of wealth should keep adding to their stack.
"Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey
Or to whom.
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>Investors would be wise to be out of gold for the short term.
Protectors of wealth should keep adding to their stack. >>
Very well said!
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>Whatever you hear or read about famous major investors doing, you should probably assume the opposite is true. These guys didn't get to be rich and famous by telling everyone what they were actually doing. >>
bingo
Whenever you hear that Soros is selling all his gold, that is the time to buy.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>Soros sold his GLD holdings 6 months ago, at prices lower than today. >>
And we have no idea if moved some or all of that that into physical holdings.
David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital used to be a large shareholder of GLD ($Billions). But he later decided it was better to transfer all those shares into physical.
On the surface he sold out of GLD. In reality his commitment to gold didn't change.
roadrunner
<< <i>You could easily say "Well lets look at what Buffett is doing" ...maybe I also should have sold my silver back at ...what...$5/oz like he did? lol >>
Great point. Even the smartest guys miss some big calls.
No one really knows for sure.
<< <i>You could easily say "Well lets look at what Buffett is doing" ...maybe I also should have sold my silver back at ...what...$5/oz like he did? lol >>
Exactly......and didn't Buffett also recently announce he took a large stake in Bank of America right before it nosedived about 25%
<< <i>You could easily say "Well lets look at what Buffett is doing" ...maybe I also should have sold my silver back at ...what...$5/oz like he did? lol >>
Considering that WB bought his silver in the 1990's it's unlikely he just sold it off in 2005-2006 because he was dissatisfied with it. After all, it was a long
term investment and had been steadily moving up since 2002. Most of us around here by 2004 were pretty sure silver was headed back to $30-$50 within
5-10 years. Warren's research must have yielded similar results. It's more likely that the banksters needed a means to fund SLV (commenced trading in April 2006)
and Buffet's 120 MILL ounces of silver was a ready source that would not raise market price. Creating SLV gave the banks a better hand to influence what silver is doing.
I doubt they created SLV so all the J6P's of the world could invest in silver. Warren was probably offered some nice "perks" in 2006 if he played ball with the banksters.
I sincerely doubt that it was as simple that he made a beginner's investment mistake and "sold too early."
roadrunner
So, the question becomes "what legislation was passed in 2005-2006 that benefited his major holdings in Wells Fargo, American Express, US Bancorp, Moodys, and MTB?"
I knew it would happen.
WEB didn't buy the common. He bought a preferred instrument paying 6% available to no one else, with warrants as a cherry on top. The value of this investment doesn't track the common at all.
<< <i>Warren was probably offered some nice "perks" in 2006 if he played ball with the banksters.
So, the question becomes "what legislation was passed in 2005-2006 that benefited his major holdings in Wells Fargo, American Express, US Bancorp, Moodys, and MTB?" >>
It could have been future concessions as well along with "insider info" from the banksters on impending Treasury and/or FED movements. He was given $5 BILL stake in Goldman
Sachs during the 2008 financial crisis that offered a 10% yield and options to purchase future shares at $115. If he excercised all that before this summer he probably did fine. The
opportunity to play with the big boyz may not have been available to him had he not played ball in 2006.
roadrunner