Home Precious Metals

CME Group Raises Comex Gold Margins By 21.5%, Silver Margins By 15.6%

(Kitco News) - CME Group Raises Comex Gold Margins By 21.5%, Silver Margins By 15.6% .




ARE YOU KIDDING ME!!!!!! Criminals image
Si vis pacem, para bellum

In God We Trust.... all others pay in Gold and Silver!

Comments

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,102 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How much is the margin? Is it a lot less than for equities? If so, why?
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,793 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This will only increase the demand for dollars in the flight to safety. That will backfire on those responsible for the hike.
    The world is on fire and not even the FED or the PPT can convince smart investors to take stock in Wall St.
    Once it is realized dollars are as great a risk as everything else, even margin requirement hikes will not keep PM prices down. Margin hikes only directly affect those buying on margin. While it affects the price that cash buyers pay, the cash buyers will overwhelm the market.

    This will only fuel a bigger spread between paper price and physical price. Keep an eye on those ASE and AGE premiums.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Don't forget Dr. Copper......which has been in a sharp tail spin for the better part of 2 months. Gotta kick that ole bleedin' dog when it's down.

    What are the odds that word was leaked out yesterday? image

    I'd follow the CME's logic a lot better if the hikes came when gold was last in the $1850-$1920 and silver >$42. This was a well orchestrated strike during options
    expiration week. They probably hatched the idea as soon as the FED came out neutral/bearish on Wednesday. Never let a good crisis go to waste.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • WingsruleWingsrule Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭✭
    What are the odds that word was leaked out yesterday?

    You could make that story work. All the big boys got out yesterday, piled into puts, then told their 'friends' one tier lower about it after the fact.
  • JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I find this all shockingimage

    MJ
    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • DrBusterDrBuster Posts: 5,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, I went and bought this afternoon and basically $3 down. Glad I spent free dollars, and glad my DCA went down with it.
  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,793 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Margin requirement increases/decreases are tools (credit limits) used to control speculation in a wide range of commodities. I believe it was recently learned that they could also be used to drive prices down/up when desired by the White House Economic Team that thinks it knows what is best for the economy. So far, they haven't shown that they know what is best for the economy, only what is best for Wall St.

    As the world economies burn there is a current flight to safety. The economic team is trying to disuade a flight to commodities, particularly PMs. If the team's goal of artificially directing investments to Wall St. fails (and it will) the only current alternative for safehaven is the $US. A rising dollar is a nightmare for the FED who has been doing everything in it's power to weaken it. There is the possibility that a negative affect on the FED's effort to keep the dollar from rising will result in an eventual desire to have commodities serve as a safehaven. I'm thinking PMs will become their second choice (behind Wall St.) if too much investment money strengthens the dollar against the FED's wishes. We may reach a point where they manipulate the price of PMs (or other selected commodities) upward to relieve rising pressure on the dollar. This will only occur if they fail to redirect commodity investors back to Wall St. equities.

    It is no longer a secret that Washington controls the flow of investment dollars. Until the markets regain control (they probably never will) it is best to either avoid investment markets, pick something that will win in the long run (physical PMs), or learn to make investment decisions based on educated guesses of Washington's next move. A successful combination of the last two will be the ultimate money maker in today's markets.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    Full Story Here.

    Google the title for the full article . . .

    HH
    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • gsa1fangsa1fan Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    I got a feeling when the Goldman Sacks was calling for $2,500 gold something was fishy!

    Leading the Sheepie to the cliff!
    image
    Avid collector of GSA's.
  • CoinCrazyPACoinCrazyPA Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Full Story Here.

    Google the title for the full article . . .

    HH >>



    Don't have a subscription
    Positive BST transactions: agentjim007, cohodk, CharlieC, Chrischampeon, DRG, 3 x delistamps, djdilliodon, gmherps13, jmski52, Meltdown, Mesquite, 2 x nibanny, themaster, 2 x segoja, Timbuk3, ve3rules, jom, Blackhawk, hchcoin, Relaxn, pitboss, blu62vette, Jfoot13, Jinx86, jfoot13,Ronb

    Successful Trades: Swampboy,
  • piecesofmepiecesofme Posts: 6,669 ✭✭✭
    I suspect this was cause the "premium" between what the Street says Silver is worth vs. what you can actually buy it for (physical) to increase...just like what happened around in '08.
    Don't quote me on exact figures, but I do distinctly remember paying $20 for a 1 oz. round when the Street said Silver was worth $16/oz. Like I said, I may be off on the timeframe as to the actual price at the time, but there was about a 25% premium going on for awhile to hold the physical.
    To forgive is to free a prisoner, and to discover that prisoner was you.

  • This was all created by the whitehouse team to discredit GB, to try and stop his "Stop the Socialism of America" efforts.

    Now our PM's are nothing but political fodder image
    NumbersUsa, FairUs, Alipac, CapsWeb, and TeamAmericaPac
  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭



    image

    imageimageimage
    Ed
  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,102 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>How much is the margin? Is it a lot less than for equities? If so, why? >>




    I dont trade futures so I dont know the answer, but if I had to guess I would say the futures market is HIGHLY leveraged. Thats why the massive runups and selloffs. Very possibly the reason PM's moved so high in the first place was that there is too much easy money and too much available leverage. If margin requirements were lower from the beginning, this pain would not have come.

    Dont blame the goose that lays the golden eggs.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,636 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It is no longer a secret that Washington controls the flow of investment dollars. Until the markets regain control (they probably never will) it is best to either avoid investment markets, pick something that will win in the long run (physical PMs), or learn to make investment decisions based on educated guesses of Washington's next move. A successful combination of the last two will be the ultimate money maker in today's markets. >>



    Yes. We have central planning now. It used to be build a better mouse trap and you created a lot
    of wealth as the world beat a path to your door to catch more mice. You bet on the mouse trap
    maker to get rich and you invested in the companies that could improve the lot of man. Now you
    bet on companies that are best positioned to pick the bones of the economy and on what the cen-
    tral planners will do next.

    I've just come to believe the idiots trying to micromanage the economy are now trying to stifle in-
    flation in order to put more money in consumer pockets so they can spend and waste our way out
    of a fundamental and structrural mess created by waste, sloth, and debt. We will convert more
    capital to waste as more meat is sucked from the bones and debt piles upon debt as waste goes
    ahead unabated. Eventually, sooner rather than later, everyone comes to see the situation is
    untenable or derivative losses bring the whole thing down in a massive bond implosion. The bed
    is likely made this time so watch for fire sale prices on metals before an utter catastrophe.

    It's a tough call really and it seems Washington has a hard time sticking to any plan. I'll wager the
    mucky mucks have the collapse planned out to five decimal points though.
    Tempus fugit.
  • No, no, it's the RAND Corp, in conjunction with the Reverse Vampires...
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 22,822 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's easy to pick out the people who are dependent on government excess.
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • There was some INSANE silver option action Friday. A 35 put I bought a few days earlier for about $100 & sold for about $1,500 Thursday (I thought I did good) was going for OVER $25,000 for a bit!

    Watch the Oct. options expiring Tuesday for some major opportunities. In fact, looks like a great time to buy a strangle for whatever price you wanna spend (i.e. pick an amount & find the necessary distance options from the money) and wait to see if there's another crazy move that will make one side explode.

    Note though that the lowest put strike is 24 & the last time I checked it was going for approx. $200-250. You can easily find a call for less than that with even less than the same amount out of the money.
  • Thanks BigRick for the options update. image
    NumbersUsa, FairUs, Alipac, CapsWeb, and TeamAmericaPac
  • Well, it looks like there was ALREADY an overnight move that would have allowed for a quintuple if one went long the 24/35 strangle! image

    "How much is the margin? Is it a lot less than for equities? If so, why?"

    Best I can tell (NOT less than "equities"),

    Gold: Initial $11,340, Mainenance $8,400, Day Trading $5,670

    Silver: Initial $25,920, Mainenance $19,200, Day Trading $N/A
  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    Don't forget these margin requirement increases also work two ways, they also increase margin for the shorts too.
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Don't forget these margin requirement increases also work two ways, they also increase margin for the shorts too. >>



    Yes, but in gold and silver the biggest shorts are the bankers who are considered commercial hedgers and therefore can get a better rate than you or I.
    And I don't think the banksters care all that much about the margin requirements as long as they are told beforehand when changes are coming.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
Sign In or Register to comment.