Three 1960 Topps cards. Thoughts on PSA sub...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4c6/3b4c60f2a8653e5ff9077998d01d981c6b155f91" alt="topps1959guy"
Hi all. I'm getting together the first 15 cards I'm going to submit to PSA. So far have a couple 1952 Topps that I previously posted, and I was thinking about these three. Any thoughts?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d97/05d972c21dc17f0414ed2544bcf72d22688378eb" alt="image"
Chris
"It doesn't pay to try. All the smart boys know why." - Johnny Thunders
"It doesn't pay to try. All the smart boys know why." - Johnny Thunders
0
Comments
Always looking for Mantle cards such as Stahl Meyer, 1954 Dan Dee, 1959 Bazooka, 1960 Post, 1952 Star Cal Decal, 1952 Tip Top Bread Labels, 1953-54 Briggs Meat, and other Topps, Bowman, and oddball Mantles.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
<< <i>It's up to you whether or not to submit them, but none will grade higher than a PSA 6. >>
Agreed, the corners are soft on the Bridges card. I appears that there is actually paper missing from the corners.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
I know, I made the same mistake on my first submission to PSA, many years ago. That card has what appears to be a rubber band indentation - that's a 6 at best right there...it's got a slight ding on the bottom right corner - that's a 6 at best right there...and who knows what else with the card in hand. Cards can't improve a full point grade when they have an obvious flaw...the grader could only spot possible other flaws that you didn't notice which could drop the grade even further.
PSA grading is tough and the most respected, which is why their values are the highest in the marketplace.
I agree with the others, save your money. These cards would be good for someone's raw set.
<< <i>Save your $$ on those 1960 cards they wont grade well - sorry. >>
+1 Why blow three of your 15 free subs on these? Graded, they won't be worth anymore than left raw. JMO, but hold off till you get better / more valuable cards to sub.
Once you get a better handle on grading, you'll be glad you didn't waste your free subs on these.