I'll take the proof 95-O that's in the Stack's-Bowers sale over a comparably graded 1895-P any day. The reason being that the former is much, much rarer, not to mention it's a branch mint proof, which in itself is cool.
<< <i>I'll take the proof 95-O that's in the Stack's-Bowers sale over a comparably graded 1895-P any day. The reason being that the former is much, much rarer, not to mention it's a branch mint proof, which in itself is cool. >>
<< <i>I'll take the proof 95-O that's in the Stack's-Bowers sale over a comparably graded 1895-P any day. The reason being that the former is much, much rarer, not to mention it's a branch mint proof, which in itself is cool. >>
TDN: Could you expand on this please? I'd like to hear why you feel this way. Thanks >>
Because the trend is away from collecting proofs and circulation strikes in one collection - and toward collecting either/or. Thus the demand for 1895 proofs [and 1858 seated dollars, etc] will trend lower toward just that from proof set collectors. Since the mintage of each is similar to the mintage of all the other proofs for the set, the price will tend to fall toward the other dates.
<< <i>the trend is away from collecting proofs and circulation strikes in one collection - and toward collecting either/or.
TDN - Would you agree that the trend is also away from set building and towards collecting individual coins? And if so, how will that impact prices? >>
Comments
<< <i>I'll take the proof 95-O that's in the Stack's-Bowers sale over a comparably graded 1895-P any day. The reason being that the former is much, much rarer, not to mention it's a branch mint proof, which in itself is cool. >>
IMO, 1895 proofs are a TERRIBLE value
<< <i>
<< <i>I'll take the proof 95-O that's in the Stack's-Bowers sale over a comparably graded 1895-P any day. The reason being that the former is much, much rarer, not to mention it's a branch mint proof, which in itself is cool. >>
IMO, 1895 proofs are a TERRIBLE value >>
I could not agree more.
<< <i>
<< <i>
IMO, 1895 proofs are a TERRIBLE value >>
TDN: Could you expand on this please? I'd like to hear why you feel this way.
Thanks
Please visit my website Millcitynumismatics.com
<< <i>
<< <i>
IMO, 1895 proofs are a TERRIBLE value >>
TDN: Could you expand on this please? I'd like to hear why you feel this way.
Thanks >>
Because the trend is away from collecting proofs and circulation strikes in one collection - and toward collecting either/or. Thus the demand for 1895 proofs [and 1858 seated dollars, etc] will trend lower toward just that from proof set collectors. Since the mintage of each is similar to the mintage of all the other proofs for the set, the price will tend to fall toward the other dates.
Since I'm not actively working on a Proof Morgan set, I would take the 1895-O all day long.
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
TDN - Would you agree that the trend is also away from set building and towards collecting individual coins? And if so, how will that impact prices?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>the trend is away from collecting proofs and circulation strikes in one collection - and toward collecting either/or.
TDN - Would you agree that the trend is also away from set building and towards collecting individual coins? And if so, how will that impact prices? >>
No, I wouldn't agree.