Pointless MLB stats/Favorite MLB stats
zendude
Posts: 208 ✭✭
in Sports Talk
W-L records for pitchers. (pretty much irrelevant)
RBI for hitters. (teammates/lineup placing play a big role)
These stats are so much a part of baseball tradition but are kind of irrelevant.
My favorite stats: OPS for hitters, ERA and WHIP for pitchers.
What are your favorite/least favorite stats?
0
Comments
Saves are a glory stat but kind of ridiculous as well.
<< <i>W-L records for pitchers. (pretty much irrelevant)
RBI for hitters. (teammates/lineup placing play a big role)
These stats are so much a part of baseball tradition but are kind of irrelevant.
My favorite stats: OPS for hitters, ERA and WHIP for pitchers.
What are your favorite/least favorite stats? >>
i'd pretty much agree with you.
to some degree this can have a function on what kind of park the hitter or pitcher plays a majority of their games, too.
Also, I think judging a pitcher by his W/L record first is unfair. ERA should count first.
And lastly, when determining the HOF worthiness of a player, his overall career stats line should come first, not championships and especially not "did he dominate for x number of years". I don't mind those other things being in favor but it shouldn't count against.
D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
y
<< <i>While we're at it, I'm not sure why the OP favors OPS over OPS+, much like ERA over ERA+.
As for Wins, while they might be misleading for those evaluating talent, it has to count for something that the guys who actually put up those stats consider it extremely important. >>
I agree. OPS+ and ERA+ are arguably the most valuable stats there are to evaluate a player's performance. I'd like to see MLB add them to the end of the season awards.
<< <i>I'd like to see MLB add them to the end of the season awards. >>
The awards are basically popularity contests. They always have been, and always will be. Just like selections to the All Star Game.
The only award based on some statistical computation is the "Rolaids Relief Pitcher of the Year Award", and even then, the methodology is debatable.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
<< <i>The awards are basically popularity contests. They always have been, and always will be. Just like selections to the All Star Game. >>
<< <i>No, the ALL-STAR GAME (especially the starting lineup) is a popularity contest. >>
Isn't that basically what I just said?
<< <i>Total bases -- It isn't really TOTAL bases if it doesn't include walks, HBP, stolen bases, and so on. It should include ALL bases reached safely for it to truly be TOTAL bases. >>
The whole idea of "total bases" is to measure how far safely HIT to, not how many bases he touched. It's also a key component of slugging percentage.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25