1956 Topps Mantle Overvalued?

Always wanted one of the triple crown year, Just looking at the pop reports and was contemplating.
Please discuss..
Please discuss..
CU Ancient Members badge member.
Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums
0
Comments
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
Yes, Mickey was better than almost all of them, but I still think his cards are over valued
at least in relation to theirs.
Regional issues may not be.
<< <i>after mysteriously not having cards in the two previous sets >>
Roar
He was under an exclusive contract with Bowman I believe.
Musial was not in any of the mainstream sets at the time because he was under
contract with Rawlings and they had to give permission for him to be included
in the regional sets (Red Man) and the like.
I think Ted Williams was in a similar situation at times as well.
Steve
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
if ya buy it from Levi - it'll definitely be overpriced!
I think a really nice 6 isn't too bad in terms of price.
Overvalued?
I agree with Steve - compared to other great players of that era - a bit much.
Currently collecting 1934 Butterfinger, 1969 Nabisco, 1991 Topps Desert Shield (in PSA 9 or 10), and 1990 Donruss Learning Series (in PSA 10).
<< <i>Not to me. It is a special card. Besides the 1956 set is one of the best looking sets. >>
Agreed wholeheartedly.
The whole '56 Topps set is phenomenal. If anything, I think too many people over look how awesome it is.
Jeff