Should sellers of .900 fine silver demand a premium if their coins are Unc. or Proof?
291fifth
Posts: 24,395 ✭✭✭✭✭
Since there has been no metal loss I would think such a demand would be appropriate.
What do you think?
What do you think?
All glory is fleeting.
0
Comments
it depends, silver proof coins '64 and before are usually melt unless they show signs of cameo
<< <i>You are looking at 723.4(unc) oz vs 715.0(circulated) oz of silver per $1000(face), so you deserve about a 1% premium. >>
If the bag contains mostly AG-G coins there may have been as much as a 10% metal loss due to circulation.
With silver at $45 an ounce I would think that it is time for .900 fine silver to be bought and sold strictly by weight and not by a "times face."
<< <i>If the bag contains mostly AG-G coins there may have been as much as a 10% metal loss due to circulation.
With silver at $45 an ounce I would think that it is time for .900 fine silver to be bought and sold strictly by weight and not by a "times face." >>
I agree that circulated may vary from the norm and that weight would be a better method.
Although, some of the dealers I know don't have the proper scales to accurately weigh heavy items.
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
<< <i>Should sellers of .900 fine silver demand a premium if their coins are Unc. or Proof? >>
As silver prices rise higher and higher the premium for "full silver metal" proofs and uncs will command a premium. That is a given.