Colorful Morgan.....

savoyspecial

.....before the naysayers scream 'AT' I would like to point out the correct color progression that this coin exhibits.......i must say, I LIKE IT!

Kove

The color effect around the date is cool, IMO.

savoyspecial

>>The color effect around the date is cool, IMO.>>


good eye! this ghosting (or 'shadow') effect also lends to the credibility of the natural color

commoncents05

Sorry, It's AT.

-Paul

Monstarcoins

Yea, I am sorry but I have a feeling it is AT. I am the first to defend colorful coins but this pattern of AT is very common, You will find Morgans like this in genuine holders all the time.

PS I hope I am wrong

Jon

airplanenut

The colors themselves scream AT to me. That, and the coin looks awfully flat for such vibrant shades.

chumley

I wouldn't pay a big premium for it but AT/NT it sure is pretty

BAJJERFAN

You buy that offa wunna them cell phone ringtone sites Greg?

fivecents

AT. I tried not to scream it.

Bochiman

Greg, if the price was right, it's cool.
Hopefully you didn't pay up for the toning...I am with the majority so far....

bestclser1

AT,bad try at Redfield toning.

pmac

How'd it get to two ends of a roll?

TomB

That doesn't look like what I would call NT to me. No way. No how.

PCcoins

Definitely AT... looks like a somewhat decent AT job, but it still has a few tall tale signs of being AT.

MikeInFL

<< <i>I would like to point out the correct color progression that this coin exhibits....... >>



Correct color progression is not necessarily indicative of NT (i.e. there are AT coins that show the correct progression), but incorrect color progression is indicative of AT (i.e. if the coin exhibits an incorrect progression, chances are it's AT).

IMO, the coin in question is QT at best, and the toning pattern leads me to say the coin was dipped and then put in a holder (intentionally or not) to retone.

Pretty coin, regardless of the above.