Help with a 1878 $3 Gold-Is this Unc., AU or what?

I am not sure about this coin. The luster is kind of patchy. I don't trust my own opinion so thought someone might know these coins well here. Any thoughts? Sorry the pic is not real clear. I don't have a very good photo setup but any thoughts would be appreciated.
p.s. I know you have to see both sides but the reverse seems better and I though the obverse is where I might have trouble.
p.s. I know you have to see both sides but the reverse seems better and I though the obverse is where I might have trouble.

Gold and silver are valuable but wisdom is priceless.
0
Comments
Sorry but coins in that price range should not be considered until professionally graded IMO.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>I'd be concerned with authenticity before I'd worry about grade. >>
Speaking in general terms or do you see a specific reason here?
The fact that it is authentic and unmolested i.e. cleaned or puttied or whatever has to be determined prior to rendering a grade.
-Paul
<< <i>
<< <i>I'd be concerned with authenticity before I'd worry about grade. >>
Speaking in general terms or do you see a specific reason here? >>
Speaking in general. I would hesitate to authenticate a gold coin without better pics but nothing on your coin would lead me to believe it's counterfeit. Appears to be AU55 give or take a grade.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>......and what appear could be depressions on the cheek... >>
Those appear to be contact marks.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>......and what appear could be depressions on the cheek... >>
Those appear to be contact marks. >>
Certainly a possibility, but again, the picture is nowhere near good enough to tell for sure what they are.
-Paul
<< <i>I am pretty sure it is authentic. There is a shelf around the 3 on the reverse and the mouth on the obverse. Also JBL is pretty crisp and clear at the base of the neck. I would think a transfer die would wipe out that detail. >>
What about the denticles around "STATES"? They look rather toothy to me....
-Paul
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>I checked with PCGS coin facts and comparing with the MS65 there, the denticle directly above the "A" in "States" has a very small bridge across to the adjacent denticles like a short die crack and this coin has one too. It barely shows in the photo even though it is a bit out of focus. I don't think counterfeiters are that good on these. >>
Good detective work! You are probably correct then.
-Paul
<< <i>Very probably real and unc, but maybe cleaned. >>
The numerous hairlines and tick marks would indicate light circulation but this is all conjecture without better pics of both sides of the coin. This coin would definitely benefit from a trip to one of the major TPG's.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Very probably real and unc, but maybe cleaned. >>
That is what concerns me most about this one. I have not got my cleaning detections skills down yet. It is pretty brilliant showing no toning but it is uniformly brilliant at least. Just don't know if I could handle a "genuine" slab on this but may give it a shot. I appreciate everyones input.
<< <i>my first thought was AU cleaned. >>
Yeah, me too.